Suppr超能文献

我们达到标准了吗?灵长类动物保护教育项目的实践与报告的成效衡量指标。

Are we making the grade? Practices and reported efficacy measures of primate conservation education programs.

作者信息

Kling Katherine J, Hopkins Mariah E

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Primatol. 2015 Apr;77(4):434-48. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22359. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

Abstract

Conservation education is often employed alongside primate conservation efforts with the aim of changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors toward non-human primates. Recommended best-use practices include longevity, use of program incentives, collaboration among educators, and adaptive program assessment, among others. This study surveys primate conservation education programs (PCEPs) to assess the frequency of suggested best-use practices, and to investigate impacts on program efficacy. Online surveys were collected from PCEPs in 2013-2014 (N = 43). The majority of programs reported lengths of 5-10 years, with participant involvement ranging widely from a day to several years. Non-economic and economic incentives were distributed by approximately half of all programs, with programs that provided economic incentives reporting positive participant attitude changes more frequently than those that did not (P = 0.03). While >70% of PCEPs consulted with community leaders, local teachers, and research scientists, only 45.9% collaborated with other conservation educators and only 27% collaborated with cultural experts such as cultural anthropologists. Programs that collaborated with other conservation educators were more likely to report reductions in threats to primates, specifically to bushmeat hunting and capture of primates for the pet trade (P = 0.07). Formal program evaluations were employed by 72.1% of all programs, with the majority of programs using surveys to assess changes to participant attitudes and knowledge. Formal evaluations of participant behavior, community attitudes and behaviors, and threats to primate populations were less common. While results indicate that PCEPs follow many suggested best-use practices, program impacts may be enhanced by greater discussion of economic incentivization, increased collaboration between conservation educators, and improved commitment to adaptive evaluation of changes to behaviors in addition to attitudes and knowledge.

摘要

保护教育通常与灵长类动物保护工作同时开展,旨在改变人们对非人类灵长类动物的认知、态度和行为。推荐的最佳使用实践包括项目的长期性、使用项目激励措施、教育工作者之间的合作以及适应性项目评估等。本研究调查了灵长类动物保护教育项目(PCEP),以评估建议的最佳使用实践的频率,并调查其对项目效果的影响。2013 - 2014年从灵长类动物保护教育项目中收集了在线调查问卷(N = 43)。大多数项目报告的时长为5至10年,参与者的参与时间跨度很大,从一天到数年不等。约一半的项目发放了非经济和经济激励措施,提供经济激励措施的项目比未提供的项目更频繁地报告参与者态度有积极变化(P = 0.03)。虽然超过70%的灵长类动物保护教育项目咨询了社区领袖、当地教师和研究科学家,但只有45.9%与其他保护教育工作者合作,只有27%与文化人类学家等文化专家合作。与其他保护教育工作者合作的项目更有可能报告灵长类动物受到的威胁有所减少,特别是对丛林肉捕猎和为宠物贸易捕获灵长类动物的威胁(P = 0.07)。所有项目中有72.1%采用了正式的项目评估,大多数项目使用调查来评估参与者态度和知识的变化。对参与者行为、社区态度和行为以及灵长类动物种群威胁的正式评估则较少见。虽然结果表明灵长类动物保护教育项目遵循了许多建议的最佳使用实践,但通过更多地讨论经济激励措施、加强保护教育工作者之间的合作以及除了态度和知识之外,更好地致力于对行为变化进行适应性评估,项目影响可能会得到增强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验