Mohamed-Djawad Mohamed H, Longo-Pendy Neil M, Dibakou Serge Ely, Puppo Costanza, Nzue-Nguema Jean, Otsaghe-Ekore Désiré, Makouloutou-Nzassi Patrice, Moussadji-Kinga Cyr, Kouga Alain P, Ngoubangoye Barthelemy, Ndiaye Pape Ibnou, Boundenga Larson
Unité de Recherche en Ecologie de la Santé (URES), Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Médicale de Franceville (CIRMF), BP 769, Franceville, Gabon.
Laboratoire de Biologie évolutive Écologie et Gestion des écosystèmes, Département de Biologie Animale, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Sénégal.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2025 Jun 5;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13002-025-00792-2.
Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) held by Indigenous communities is increasingly recognised as a cost effective, locally adapted complement to instrument-based wildlife monitoring. In southern Gabon, hunter trackers routinely distinguish chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes and western lowland gorilla Gorilla gorilla gorilla faeces in the field, yet the reliability of these identifications has never been rigorously tested.
Twenty-two experienced Indigenous participants guided systematic surveys across ~ 10 000 ha of unprotected forest near Makatamangoy and Tébé. For every faecal sample encountered, collaborators reached a consensual species identification using their customary criteria (colour, odour, texture, composition, quantity, associated footprints, vegetation disturbance). Samples (n = 637) were preserved in RNAlater and later assigned to species by 12S rRNA mitochondrial sequencing. Agreement between Indigenous and molecular identifications was summarised in a confusion matrix; accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and Cohen's κ were calculated. The prevalence of each empirical criterion was expressed as the proportion of interviewees citing it, and species differences were tested with Fisher's exact tests (α = 0.05).
Indigenous knowledge correctly identified 633 of 637 samples (overall accuracy = 99.37%; κ = 0.987, p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 99.1% for chimpanzee and 99.0% for gorilla, while specificity exceeded 99.6% for both species. Seven primary criteria underpinned identifications; colour (100%) and odour (86.4%) were most frequently evoked. Twelve of 24 sub-criteria differed significantly between species. Chimpanzee faeces were more often described as brown-yellow, soft and abundant with faint heelprints, whereas gorilla faeces were typically black, fibrous, hard and accompanied by pronounced heel and fist prints plus flattened vegetation.
Indigenous trackers in Gabon demonstrate near-perfect accuracy in differentiating great ape faeces, validating TEK as a robust, low-cost tool for primate monitoring. Integrating this expertise into participatory conservation programmes could expand surveillance outside protected areas, enhance early detection of demographic or health changes, and strengthen community stewardship of threatened ape populations.
土著社区拥有的传统生态知识(TEK)越来越被认为是一种具有成本效益、适用于当地情况的基于仪器的野生动物监测的补充手段。在加蓬南部,猎人追踪者在野外能够常规地区分黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes troglodytes)和西部低地大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla gorilla)的粪便,但这些鉴别方法的可靠性从未经过严格测试。
22名经验丰富的土著参与者在马卡塔芒戈伊(Makatamangoy)和特贝(Tébé)附近约10000公顷的未受保护森林中指导系统调查。对于遇到的每一份粪便样本,参与者根据他们的习惯标准(颜色、气味、质地、成分、数量、相关脚印、植被扰动)达成一致的物种鉴定。样本(n = 637)保存在RNA later中,随后通过12S rRNA线粒体测序确定物种。土著鉴定和分子鉴定之间的一致性在混淆矩阵中进行总结;计算准确性、敏感性、特异性、预测值和科恩kappa系数。每个经验标准的普遍性表示为引用该标准的受访者比例,物种差异用费舍尔精确检验进行测试(α = 0.05)。
土著知识正确鉴定了637个样本中的633个(总体准确率 = 99.37%;κ = 0.987,p < 0.001)。黑猩猩的敏感性为99.1%,大猩猩的敏感性为99.0%,而两个物种的特异性均超过99.6%。七种主要标准支撑着鉴定结果;颜色(100%)和气味(86.4%)被提及的频率最高。24个次要标准中有12个在物种之间存在显著差异。黑猩猩粪便更常被描述为棕黄色、柔软且量大,带有模糊的脚跟印,而大猩猩粪便通常为黑色、纤维状、坚硬,并伴有明显的脚跟和拳印以及被压平的植被。
加蓬的土著追踪者在区分大猩猩粪便方面表现出近乎完美的准确性,验证了传统生态知识作为一种强大、低成本的灵长类动物监测工具的有效性。将这种专业知识纳入参与式保护计划可以扩大保护区外的监测范围,加强对种群数量或健康变化的早期检测,并加强社区对濒危猿类种群的管理。