Jastaniah Wasil, Elimam Naglla, Abdalla Khalid, Iqbal Basheer Ahmed Cittana, Khattab Taha M, Felimban Sami, Abrar Mohammed Burhan
Princess Noorah Oncology Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University and King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Umm AlQura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Jun;62(6):945-50. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25374. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
The outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in developing countries is less favorable than in developed countries, primarily due to resource constraints. However, it is unknown whether the therapeutic results differ. Thus, we hypothesized that outcomes in resource-rich developing countries would be similar to those in industrialized regions.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 224 consecutive children with ALL, who were treated according to the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) protocols between January 2001 and December 2007. High-risk (HR) and standard-risk (SR) patients were treated with modified CCG-1961 and CCG-1991 protocols, respectively. Modifications included substitution of dexamethasone for prednisone in HR patients and addition of two intrathecal methotrexate treatments for CNS2 patients during induction. All patients received double delayed intensification with two interim maintenance phases.
Five-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 84.7 ± 2.4%, 77.0 ± 2.9%, and 81.4 ± 2.7%, respectively. Remission was achieved in 98.1% of the patients. Induction failure and relapse rates were 1.9% and 15.1%, respectively. Death as the first event occurred in 6.4% of cases, of which 2.7% and 3.7% involved deaths in induction and remission, respectively. Interestingly, a significant reduction in induction deaths was observed over time.
Despite the encouraging results observed in the present study, our patients displayed significantly lower survival outcomes compared to subjects treated in major clinical trials conducted by leading leukemia cooperative groups. Furthermore, this work underscores the need for targeted interventions to reduce death as the first event in developing regions.
发展中国家急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿的治疗结果不如发达国家,主要是由于资源限制。然而,治疗结果是否存在差异尚不清楚。因此,我们假设资源丰富的发展中国家的治疗结果将与工业化地区相似。
我们对2001年1月至2007年12月期间按照儿童癌症集团(CCG)方案治疗的224例连续ALL患儿进行了回顾性分析。高危(HR)和标准风险(SR)患者分别采用改良的CCG-1961和CCG-1991方案治疗。修改内容包括HR患者用地塞米松替代泼尼松,诱导期为CNS2患者增加两次鞘内甲氨蝶呤治疗。所有患者均接受两次中期维持阶段的双重延迟强化治疗。
五年总生存率(OS)、无事件生存率(EFS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为84.7±2.4%、77.0±2.9%和81.4±2.7%。98.1%的患者实现缓解。诱导失败率和复发率分别为1.9%和15.1%。作为首发事件的死亡率为6.4%,其中诱导期和缓解期死亡分别占2.7%和3.7%。有趣的是,随着时间的推移,诱导期死亡显著减少。
尽管本研究观察到了令人鼓舞的结果,但与主要白血病合作组进行的主要临床试验中的受试者相比,我们的患者生存结果显著较低。此外,这项工作强调了在发展中地区采取有针对性干预措施以降低首发事件死亡率的必要性。