Department of Emergency Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Mar;13(3):347-52. doi: 10.1111/jth.12829. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
The CURRENT-OASIS-7 and PLATO trials suggest that the benefit of clopidogrel is influenced by the dose of aspirin.
To explore a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between aspirin and clopidogrel, and determinants of clopidogrel active metabolite (AM) levels.
In part 1, using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we randomized patients to clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by 150 mg day(-1) for 6 days and 75 mg day(-1) thereafter, or clopidogrel 300 mg LD followed by 75 mg day(-1) thereafter, and compared aspirin at 325 mg or 81 mg day(-1) . In part 2, patients were given a 600-mg clopidogrel LD, and were randomly allocated to aspirin 325 mg or 81 mg day(-1) . We combine the data from the two parts. Blood samples were collected 1 h after administration of the study drug.
We randomized 302 patients (mean age 60.4 ± 9.9 years). Clopidogrel AM levels were similar in patients randomized to aspirin 325 or 81 mg (geometric mean, 12.70 ng mL(-1) ; 95% CI, 10.96-14.72 ng mL(-1) ; and geometric mean, 12.55 ng mL(-1) ; 95% CI, 10.80-14.58 ng mL(-1) ; P = 0.91). Blood levels of clopidogrel were lower in CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function (LOF) carriers compared with non-carriers (10.72 ng mL(-1) ; 95% CI, 8.83-13.01 ng mL(-1) ; and 15.21 ng mL(-1) ; 95% CI, 13.30-17.40 ng mL(-1) , respectively; P = 0.003) whereas levels in gain of function carriers and non-carriers were similar (13.31 ng mL(-1) ; 95% CI, 11.53-15.35 ng mL(-1) ; and 14.07 ng mL(-1) ; 95% CI, 11.74-16.87 ng mL(-1) , respectively; P = 0.4). Independent baseline predictors of clopidogrel AM levels were LOF genotype, body mass index, diabetes, proton pump inhibitor use and creatinine clearance, but accounted for only 20% of the variability in levels.
Aspirin dose does not predict clopidogrel AM levels 1 h post-LD. Most of the variability in clopidogrel AM levels is not explained by patient characteristics or CYP2C19 metabolizer status.
CURRENT-OASIS-7 和 PLATO 试验表明,氯吡格雷的获益受阿司匹林剂量的影响。
探索阿司匹林和氯吡格雷之间潜在的药代动力学相互作用,以及氯吡格雷活性代谢物(AM)水平的决定因素。
在第 1 部分中,我们采用 2×2 析因设计,将患者随机分配至氯吡格雷 600 mg 负荷剂量(LD)后,分别给予 150 mg/天持续 6 天,此后给予 75 mg/天,或氯吡格雷 300 mg LD 后,此后给予 75 mg/天,同时分别给予阿司匹林 325 mg 或 81 mg/天。在第 2 部分中,患者给予 600 mg 氯吡格雷 LD,随机分配至阿司匹林 325 mg 或 81 mg/天。我们合并两部分的数据。在给予研究药物后 1 h 采集血样。
我们共纳入 302 例患者(平均年龄 60.4±9.9 岁)。随机给予阿司匹林 325 mg 或 81 mg 的患者中,氯吡格雷 AM 水平相似(几何均数,12.70ng/mL;95%CI,10.96-14.72ng/mL;和几何均数,12.55ng/mL;95%CI,10.80-14.58ng/mL;P=0.91)。与非携带者相比,CYP2C19*2 功能丧失(LOF)携带者的氯吡格雷血药水平较低(10.72ng/mL;95%CI,8.83-13.01ng/mL;和 15.21ng/mL;95%CI,13.30-17.40ng/mL;P=0.003),而功能获得型携带者和非携带者的水平相似(13.31ng/mL;95%CI,11.53-15.35ng/mL;和 14.07ng/mL;95%CI,11.74-16.87ng/mL;P=0.4)。氯吡格雷 AM 水平的独立基线预测因素为 LOF 基因型、体重指数、糖尿病、质子泵抑制剂的使用和肌酐清除率,但仅解释了水平变异性的 20%。
负荷剂量后 1 h,阿司匹林剂量不能预测氯吡格雷 AM 水平。氯吡格雷 AM 水平的大部分变异性不能用患者特征或 CYP2C19 代谢物状态来解释。