Prasad Singamsetty E R V, Indukuri Ravikishore Reddy, Singh Rupesh, Nooney Anitha, Palagiri Firoz Babu, Narayana Veera
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Drs S and NR Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Chinaoutpally, Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Saraswathi Dhanwantari Dental College, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 Dec;4(Suppl 2):S105-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.146212.
A thorough knowledge of the salient features of malocclusion helps the clinician in arriving at a proper diagnosis and treatment plan, and also to predict the prognosis, prior to the onset of treatment process. Among the four classes of Angle's classification of malocclusion, Class II division 2 occurs with the least frequency. There is still continuing debate in the literature whether the Class II division 2 patients ascribe the pathognomonic skeletal and dental features.
The aim of this study is to describe the unique features of Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion to differentiate it from Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion.
A total of 582 pre-treatment records (study models and cephalograms), with the age of patients ranging from 15 to 22 years, were obtained from the hospital records of Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram and Geetam's Dental College, Visakhapatnam. Out of these, 11 pre-treatment records were excluded because of lack of clarity. In the rest of the sample, 283 were Class II division 1 and 288 were Class II division 2. The lateral cephalograms were analyzed by using digiceph and the arch width analysis was done based on the anatomical points described by Staley et al. and Sergl et al.
An intergroup evaluation was done by using unpaired Student's "t" test. The skeletal vertical parameters, dental parameters, and the maxillary arch width parameters revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups of malocclusion.
Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion has a pronounced horizontal growth pattern with decreased lower anterior facial height, retroclined upper anteriors, and significantly increased maxillary arch width parameters.
深入了解错颌畸形的显著特征有助于临床医生做出正确的诊断和治疗方案,并在治疗过程开始前预测预后。在安氏错颌畸形的四类分类中,安氏II类2分类的发生率最低。关于安氏II类2分类患者是否具有特征性的骨骼和牙齿特征,文献中仍存在持续的争论。
本研究的目的是描述安氏II类2分类错颌畸形的独特特征,以将其与安氏II类1分类错颌畸形区分开来。
从毗湿奴牙科学院(比马瓦拉姆)和吉塔姆牙科学院(维沙卡帕特南)的医院记录中获取了总共582份治疗前记录(研究模型和头影测量片),患者年龄在15至22岁之间。其中,11份治疗前记录因清晰度不足而被排除。在其余样本中,283份为II类1分类,288份为II类2分类。使用digiceph对头影测量片进行分析,并根据斯泰利等人和塞尔格等人描述的解剖学点进行牙弓宽度分析。
采用非配对学生“t”检验进行组间评估。骨骼垂直参数、牙齿参数和上颌牙弓宽度参数在两组错颌畸形之间显示出统计学上的显著差异。
安氏II类2分类错颌畸形具有明显的水平生长模式,下颌前部面部高度降低,上颌前牙舌倾,上颌牙弓宽度参数显著增加。