Kaminedi Raja Rajeswari, Penumatsa Narendra Varma, Priya Tulasi, Baroudi Kusai
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi College, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pedodontics, College of Dentistry, Salman Bin Abdul Aziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 Dec;4(Suppl 2):S99-S104. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.146211.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites.
Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepared, 50 for each type of composite. The specimens were divided into five groups according to the time of finishing and polishing (immediate, 15 min, 24 h and dry). Composite under the Mylar strip without finishing and polishing was taken as the control group. Surface roughness was measured with environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) and microhardness was determined using Vickers Microhardness Tester. Data collected were statistically analyzed by t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey's post hoc test.
Smooth surface with low hardness was obtained for the group under Mylar strip without finishing and polishing. The highest roughness was recorded for delayed finishing and polishing for both composites. Immediate finishing and polishing increased the surface hardness more than that in the control group in both types of composites. Dry finishing reduced the hardness significantly for micro hybrid composite, but resulted in the highest surface hardness for nanofilled composite.
Immediate finishing and polishing under coolant resulted in the best surface smoothness and hardness values in micro hybrid composite; however, immediate dry finishing and polishing gave the best smoothness and hardness values in nanohybrid composite.
本研究旨在评估修整时间和抛光时间对纳米填料复合树脂和混合型复合树脂表面粗糙度及显微硬度的影响。
制备了100个来自微混合复合树脂和纳米混合复合树脂的圆盘状复合树脂试件,每种复合树脂各50个。根据修整和抛光时间将试件分为五组(即刻、15分钟、24小时和干燥)。以未进行修整和抛光的聚酯薄膜条下的复合树脂作为对照组。使用环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)测量表面粗糙度,并使用维氏显微硬度计测定显微硬度。收集的数据通过t检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计学分析,随后进行土耳其事后检验。
未进行修整和抛光的聚酯薄膜条下的组获得了低硬度的光滑表面。两种复合树脂延迟修整和抛光的粗糙度最高。即刻修整和抛光在两种复合树脂中均比对照组更能提高表面硬度。干式修整显著降低了微混合复合树脂的硬度,但使纳米填料复合树脂的表面硬度最高。
在冷却液下即刻修整和抛光在微混合复合树脂中产生了最佳的表面光滑度和硬度值;然而,即刻干式修整和抛光在纳米混合复合树脂中给出了最佳的光滑度和硬度值。