Section Thorax-Vascular Disease-Abdomen-Metabolism, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France.
Intensive Care Unit, Ambroise-Paré, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt; and Faculty of Medicine Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France.; Section Thorax-Vascular Disease-Abdomen-Metabolism, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France..
Chest. 2015 Jan;147(1):259-265. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0877.
The ventilatory strategy for ARDS has been regularly amended over the last 40 years as knowledge of the pathophysiology of ARDS has increased. Initially focused mainly on the lung with the objectives of "opening the lung" and optimizing arterial oxygen saturation, this strategy now also takes into account pulmonary vascular injury and its effects on the right ventricle and on hemodynamics. Hemodynamic devices now available at the bedside, such as echocardiography, allow intensivists to evaluate respiratory settings according to right ventricular tolerance. Here, we review the pathophysiology of pulmonary vascular dysfunction in ARDS, consider the beneficial and deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation, describe the incidence and meaning of acute cor pulmonale based on recent studies in large series of patients, and propose a new, although not strictly validated, approach based on the protection of both the lung and right ventricle. One of our conclusions is that evaluating the right ventricle may help intensivists to assess the balance between recruitment and overdistension induced by the ventilatory strategy. Prone positioning with its beneficial effects on the lung and also on hemodynamics (the right ventricle) is a good illustration of this. Readers should be aware that most of the information given in this article reflects the point of view of the authors. Although based on clinical observations, clinical studies, and well-known pathophysiology, there is no evidence-based medicine to support this clinical commentary. Other approaches may be favored, in which case our article should be read as another attempt to help intensivists to improve management of ARDS.
在过去的 40 年中,随着对 ARDS 病理生理学认识的不断提高,ARDS 的通气策略也得到了定期修正。最初主要集中在肺部,目标是“开放肺部”和优化动脉血氧饱和度,现在该策略还考虑到了肺血管损伤及其对右心室和血液动力学的影响。目前床边可用的血流动力学设备,如超声心动图,允许重症监护医生根据右心室的耐受性来评估呼吸设置。在这里,我们回顾了 ARDS 中肺血管功能障碍的病理生理学,考虑了机械通气的有益和有害影响,根据最近对大型患者系列的研究描述了急性肺心病的发生率和意义,并提出了一种新的方法(尽管没有经过严格验证),基于对肺和右心室的保护。我们的结论之一是,评估右心室可以帮助重症监护医生评估通气策略引起的肺复张和过度膨胀之间的平衡。俯卧位通气对肺和血液动力学(右心室)都有有益的影响,很好地说明了这一点。读者应该注意到,本文给出的大多数信息反映了作者的观点。尽管基于临床观察、临床研究和众所周知的病理生理学,但没有循证医学证据支持这篇临床评论。可能会青睐其他方法,在这种情况下,我们的文章应被视为帮助重症监护医生改善 ARDS 管理的另一种尝试。