Solomon Paul A, Crumpler Dennis, Flanagan James B, Jayanty R K M, Rickman Ed E, McDade Charles E
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2014 Dec;64(12):1410-38. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2014.956904.
The US. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) initiated the national PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Network (CSN) in 2000 to support evaluation of long-term trends and to better quantify the impact of sources on particulate matter (PM) concentrations in the size range below 2.5 μm aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5; fine particles). The network peaked at more than 260 sites in 2005. In response to the 1999 Regional Haze Rule and the need to better understand the regional transport of PM, EPA also augmented the long-existing Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) visibility monitoring network in 2000, adding nearly 100 additional IMPROVE sites in rural Class 1 Areas across the country. Both networks measure the major chemical components of PM2.5 using historically accepted filter-based methods. Components measured by both networks include major anions, carbonaceous material, and a series of trace elements. CSN also measures ammonium and other cations directly, whereas IMPROVE estimates ammonium assuming complete neutralization of the measured sulfate and nitrate. IMPROVE also measures chloride and nitrite. In general, the field and laboratory approaches used in the two networks are similar; however, there are numerous, often subtle differences in sampling and chemical analysis methods, shipping, and quality control practices. These could potentially affect merging the two data sets when used to understand better the impact of sources on PM concentrations and the regional nature and long-range transport of PM2zs. This paper describes, for the first time in the peer-reviewed literature, these networks as they have existed since 2000, outlines differences infield and laboratory approaches, provides a summary of the analytical parameters that address data uncertainty, and summarizes major network changes since the inception of CSN. Implications: Two long-term chemical speciation particle monitoring networks have operated simultaneously in the United States since 2001, when the EPA began regular operations of its PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Network (IMPROVE began in 1988). These networks use similar field sampling and analytical methods, but there are numerous, often subtle differences in equipment and methodologies that can affect the results. This paper describes these networks since 20000 (inception of CSN) and their differences, and summarizes the analytical parameters that address data uncertainty, providing researches and policymakers with background information they may need (e.g., for 2018 PM2.5 designation and State Implementation Plan process; McCarthy, 2013) to assess results from each network and decide how these data sets can be mutually employed for enhanced analyses. Changes in CSN and IMPROVE that have occurred over the years also are described.
2000年,美国环境保护局(EPA)启动了国家PM2.5化学形态监测网络(CSN),以支持对长期趋势的评估,并更好地量化源对空气动力学直径小于2.5μm的颗粒物(PM2.5;细颗粒物)浓度的影响。该网络在2005年达到了260多个站点的峰值。为响应1999年的《区域雾霾规则》以及更好地了解PM区域传输的需求,EPA还在2000年扩充了长期存在的保护视觉环境跨部门监测(IMPROVE)能见度监测网络,在全国农村1类地区增加了近100个IMPROVE站点。两个网络都使用历史上公认的基于滤膜的方法来测量PM2.5的主要化学成分。两个网络测量的成分包括主要阴离子、含碳物质和一系列微量元素。CSN还直接测量铵和其他阳离子,而IMPROVE则在假设所测硫酸盐和硝酸盐完全中和的情况下估算铵含量。IMPROVE还测量氯化物和亚硝酸盐。一般来说,两个网络所采用的现场和实验室方法相似;然而,在采样、化学分析方法、运输和质量控制实践方面存在许多往往很细微的差异。当用于更好地理解源对PM浓度的影响以及PM2.5的区域特性和长距离传输时,这些差异可能会影响两个数据集的合并。本文在同行评审文献中首次描述了自2000年以来存在的这些网络,概述了现场和实验室方法的差异,提供了处理数据不确定性的分析参数总结,并总结了自CSN成立以来网络的主要变化。启示:自2001年EPA开始其PM2.5化学形态监测网络的常规运行(IMPROVE始于1988年)以来,美国同时运行着两个长期的化学形态颗粒物监测网络。这些网络使用相似的现场采样和分析方法,但在设备和方法上存在许多往往很细微的差异,可能会影响结果。本文描述了自2000年(CSN成立)以来的这些网络及其差异,并总结了处理数据不确定性的分析参数,为研究人员和政策制定者提供他们可能需要的背景信息(例如,用于2018年PM2.5指定和州实施计划过程;麦卡锡,2013),以评估每个网络的结果,并决定如何相互利用这些数据集进行强化分析。还描述了这些年来CSN和IMPROVE发生的变化。