Franco Letícia P, Souki Bernardo Q, Cheib Paula L, Abrão Marcel, Pereira Tatiana B J, Becker Helena M G, Pinto Jorge A
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Outpatient Clinic for Mouth-Breathers, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Outpatient Clinic for Mouth-Breathers, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Orthodontics, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Feb;79(2):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
To test the null hypothesis that mouth-breathing (MB) children by distinct obstructive tissues present a similar cephalometric pattern.
The sample included 226 prepubescent children (113 MB and 113 nasal breathing (NB) controls). An ENT clinical examination, including flexible nasal endoscopy, orthodontic clinical and cephalometric examinations, was performed on the MB population. MB children were grouped into three categories, according to the obstructive tissues: 1) adenoid group (AG), 2) tonsillar group (TG), and 3) adenotonsillar group (ATG). The NB controls were matched by gender, age, sagittal dental relationship and skeletal maturation status. Lateral cephalometric radiography provided the cephalometric pattern comparisons between the MB and NB groups.
MB cephalometric measurements were significantly different from those of NB children, exception in the SNB° (P=0.056). All comparisons between the three groups of MB children with the NB children showed a significant difference. Finally, even among the three groups of MB children, a significant difference was observed in the measurements of the SNB° (P<0.036), NSGn° (P<0.028) and PFH/TAFH ratio (posterior facial height/total anterior facial height) (P<0.012).
The cephalometric pattern of MB and NB children was not similar. Cephalometric measurements of the MB group differed according to the etiology of upper airway obstruction. Children with isolated hypertrophy of the palatine tonsils presented with a mandible that was positioned more forward and upward compared to children obstructed only by the enlarged adenoid.
检验零假设,即不同阻塞组织导致口呼吸(MB)的儿童呈现相似的头影测量模式。
样本包括226名青春期前儿童(113名头呼吸儿童和113名鼻呼吸(NB)对照儿童)。对MB儿童群体进行了耳鼻喉科临床检查,包括软性鼻内窥镜检查、正畸临床和头影测量检查。根据阻塞组织,将MB儿童分为三类:1)腺样体组(AG),2)扁桃体组(TG),3)腺样体扁桃体组(ATG)。NB对照儿童按性别、年龄、矢状牙关系和骨骼成熟状态进行匹配。侧位头影测量X线片提供了MB组和NB组之间的头影测量模式比较。
MB儿童的头影测量值与NB儿童的显著不同,除了SNB°(P = 0.056)。三组MB儿童与NB儿童之间的所有比较均显示出显著差异。最后,即使在三组MB儿童之间,SNB°(P < 0.036)、NSGn°(P < 0.028)和PFH/TAFH比值(后面部高度/总前面部高度)(P < 0.012)的测量值也存在显著差异。
MB儿童和NB儿童的头影测量模式不相似。MB组的头影测量值因上气道阻塞的病因不同而有所差异。与仅因腺样体肿大而阻塞的儿童相比,腭扁桃体孤立肥大的儿童下颌骨位置更靠前、更高。