Suppr超能文献

对回忆的控制因情境类型而异:来自排除任务的事件相关电位证据。

Control over recollection varies with context-type: ERP evidence from the exclusion task.

作者信息

Bridger Emma K, Sprondel Volker, Mecklinger Axel

机构信息

a Experimental Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Psychology , Saarland University , Saarbrücken , Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Neurosci. 2015;6(1):31-8. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2014.996211. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

Abstract

The left-parietal ERP old/new effect—an index of recollection—is often larger for classes of item to-be-endorsed as old (targets) than to-be-rejected items (nontargets), and this has been interpreted as an index of selective retrieval. The question of interest here was whether selective retrieval would be more pronounced when targets are allocated according to distinct conceptual encoding tasks than when designated according to spatial location. Participants saw words on the left/right side of fixation and made a pleasantness or function judgment to each. Across test-blocks, target designation varied according to the kind of task judgment or the study location. Robust target old/new effects were observed for both classes of target designation but the nontarget amplitude was smaller when conceptual information was targeted. The current data indicate that the class of to-be-retrieved information determines the extent to which recollection can be controlled when all other factors are held constant.

摘要

左顶叶事件相关电位的旧/新效应——一种回忆指标——对于被认定为旧的项目类别(目标)通常比对被拒绝的项目(非目标)更大,这被解释为选择性提取的指标。这里感兴趣的问题是,当根据不同的概念编码任务分配目标时,选择性提取是否会比根据空间位置指定目标时更明显。参与者在注视点的左侧/右侧看到单词,并对每个单词进行愉悦度或功能判断。在各个测试块中,目标指定根据任务判断的类型或学习位置而变化。对于这两类目标指定都观察到了强烈的目标旧/新效应,但当以概念信息为目标时,非目标的振幅较小。当前数据表明,在所有其他因素保持不变的情况下,待提取信息的类别决定了回忆可以被控制的程度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验