• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估冷射频去神经术治疗骶髂关节区域疼痛的随机试验的12个月随访

Twelve-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment for Sacroiliac Region Pain.

作者信息

Patel Nilesh

机构信息

Advanced Pain Management, Green Bay, Brown County, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Orthopedic Center of Florida, Ft. Myers, Florida, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2016 Feb;16(2):154-67. doi: 10.1111/papr.12269. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12269
PMID:25565322
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report the long-term outcomes of cooled radiofrequency (CRF) lateral branch neurotomy (LBN) as a treatment for sacroiliac (SI) region pain. Whereas the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month outcomes of this procedure compared to sham treatment were previously reported, this current report shows the 12-month outcomes of CRF/LBN treatment for SI region pain.

DESIGN

This study originally included 51 subjects who were randomized 2:1 to receive CRF/LBN treatment or a sham intervention, respectively, for SI region pain. Subjects and assessors were blinded for 3 months. At that time, sham participants were permitted to receive CRF/LBN, designated as "crossover" study subjects, and followed for 6 additional months. For the purpose of this evaluation, the original CRF/LBN-treated study subjects were followed for a total of 12 months. Study participants were 18 to 88 years of age and had chronic (symptomatic for >6 months) axial back pain. All subjects were qualified for study inclusion following positive responses to dual lateral branch blocks. Lateral branch neurotomy was performed by CRF to ablate the S1 to S3 lateral branches and the L5 dorsal ramus. Pain was measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) and Short Form 36-bodily pain (SF36-BP) scores. The Oswestry disability index and Short Form 36-physical functioning (SF36-PF) assessment each served to evaluate subject disability. Treatment successes ("responders") in the originally treated CRF/LBN group at 12 months, and in the crossover group at 6 months, were also determined.

RESULTS

In the original CRF/LBN treatment group, 12-month outcomes compared to baseline were favorable, with a mean 2.7 point drop in the NRS score, a 13.9 decrease in the ODI, and a 15.8 increase in SF-36BP. In the crossover study group, 6-month outcomes were also favorable, with a mean NRS score decrease of 2.5 points, a reduction in ODI of 8.8, and an increase in SF36-BP of 11.9.

CONCLUSIONS

These favorable 12-month results illustrate the durability of effective CRF/LBN-mediated treatment of SI region pain for selected patients. Furthermore, successful CRF/LBN treatments in unblinded crossover study subjects demonstrate the unlikelihood that such positive outcomes are attributable to a "placebo" effect, and suggest that CRF/LBN is an effective therapeutic option for alleviating pain, and improving physical function and quality of life, with few complications.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是报告冷射频(CRF)侧支神经切断术(LBN)治疗骶髂关节(SI)区域疼痛的长期疗效。此前已报告了该手术与假手术治疗相比1个月、3个月、6个月和9个月的疗效,本报告展示了CRF/LBN治疗SI区域疼痛的12个月疗效。

设计

本研究最初纳入51名受试者,他们被随机按2:1比例分别接受CRF/LBN治疗或假干预,以治疗SI区域疼痛。受试者和评估者在3个月内处于盲态。那时,假手术参与者被允许接受CRF/LBN治疗,被指定为“交叉”研究受试者,并再随访6个月。为了本次评估,最初接受CRF/LBN治疗的研究受试者总共随访12个月。研究参与者年龄在18至88岁之间,患有慢性(症状持续>6个月)轴性背痛。所有受试者在双侧支阻滞呈阳性反应后符合研究纳入标准。通过CRF进行侧支神经切断术以消融S1至S3侧支和L5背支。疼痛通过数字评分量表(NRS)和简明健康状况调查量表36项躯体疼痛(SF36-BP)评分进行测量。Oswestry功能障碍指数和简明健康状况调查量表36项身体功能(SF36-PF)评估均用于评估受试者的功能障碍。还确定了最初接受CRF/LBN治疗组在12个月时以及交叉组在6个月时的治疗成功情况(“反应者”)。

结果

在最初的CRF/LBN治疗组中,与基线相比,12个月的疗效良好,NRS评分平均下降2.7分,ODI下降13.9,SF-36BP增加15.8。在交叉研究组中,6个月的疗效也良好,NRS评分平均下降2.5分,ODI下降8.8,SF36-BP增加11.9。

结论

这些良好的12个月结果说明了CRF/LBN介导的有效治疗对特定患者SI区域疼痛的持久性。此外,在非盲交叉研究受试者中CRF/LBN治疗成功表明这些积极结果不太可能归因于“安慰剂”效应,并表明CRF/LBN是缓解疼痛、改善身体功能和生活质量且并发症较少的有效治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Twelve-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment for Sacroiliac Region Pain.一项评估冷射频去神经术治疗骶髂关节区域疼痛的随机试验的12个月随访
Pain Pract. 2016 Feb;16(2):154-67. doi: 10.1111/papr.12269. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
2
A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain.一项随机、安慰剂对照研究,评估外侧支神经切断术治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛的疗效。
Pain Med. 2012 Mar;13(3):383-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01328.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
3
Use of cooled radiofrequency lateral branch neurotomy for the treatment of sacroiliac joint-mediated low back pain: a large case series.使用冷却射频侧支神经切断术治疗骶髂关节介导的下腰痛:一项大病例系列研究。
Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1111/pme.12014. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
4
Cooled radiofrequency application for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain.冷却射频应用治疗骶髂关节疼痛。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jul;153(7):1461-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1003-8. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
5
Comparison of Efficacy of Lateral Branch Pulsed Radiofrequency Denervation and Intraarticular Depot Methylprednisolone Injection for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.经皮侧支脉冲射频神经调节术与关节内注射甲泼尼龙治疗骶髂关节疼痛的疗效比较。
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):489-496.
6
Cooled radiofrequency ablation versus standard medical management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a multicenter, randomized comparative effectiveness study.冷却射频消融与标准医学管理治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛的比较:一项多中心、随机对照有效性研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Mar 4;49(3):184-191. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104568.
7
Radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain-comparison of two different ablation techniques.射频消融术治疗骶髂关节疼痛——两种不同消融技术的比较。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Feb;43(1):101-107. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1016-3. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain.评估骶髂关节疼痛的外侧支射频去神经术的随机安慰剂对照研究。
Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):279-88. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f4c7c.
9
Endoscopic Radiofrequency Treatment of the Sacroiliac Joint Complex for Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study with a 2-Year Follow-Up.内镜下射频治疗骶髂关节复合体治疗下腰痛:一项前瞻性研究,随访 2 年。
Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):E111-E118.
10
Long-term follow-up in sacroiliac joint pain patients treated with radiofrequency ablative therapy.接受射频消融治疗的骶髂关节疼痛患者的长期随访
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015 Jun;73(6):476-9. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20150049.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of sacroiliac joint pain: current concepts.骶髂关节疼痛的管理:当前概念
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 21;35(1):208. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04308-2.
2
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: anatomy, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment approaches.骶髂关节功能障碍:解剖学、病理生理学、鉴别诊断及治疗方法
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Jun;54(6):1195-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04831-z. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Two-Centre Retrospective Analysis on Selective Sensory Denervation of Shoulder Joint by Means of Cooled Radiofrequency in Chronic Shoulder Pain.
两中心关于慢性肩痛患者采用冷循环射频进行肩关节选择性感觉神经去神经术的回顾性分析
J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 26;17:3139-3150. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S463583. eCollection 2024.
4
The effectiveness and safety of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN): A systematic review.骶外侧支射频神经切断术(SLBRFN)的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价。
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Jun 16;2(2):100259. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100259. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of the Sacroiliac Joint.射频消融骶髂关节的有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 May;28(5):335-372. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01226-6. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Interventional treatments for low back pain due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a systematic review of the literature.骶髂关节功能障碍所致下腰痛的介入治疗:文献系统综述
Eur Spine J. 2024 Apr;33(4):1407-1423. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08130-y. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
Comparative Efficacy of Clinical Interventions for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis With Preliminary Design of Treatment Algorithm.骶髂关节疼痛临床干预措施的比较疗效:系统评价与网状Meta分析及治疗算法的初步设计
Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):997-1010. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346586.293. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
9
Cooled radiofrequency ablation versus standard medical management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a multicenter, randomized comparative effectiveness study.冷却射频消融与标准医学管理治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛的比较:一项多中心、随机对照有效性研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Mar 4;49(3):184-191. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104568.
10
Effect of Fluoroscopic-Guided Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.透视引导下皮质类固醇注射对骶髂关节功能障碍患者的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 20;15(3):e36406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36406. eCollection 2023 Mar.