• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗把关与财务把关:在药房柜台应对专业意外情况

Medical versus fiscal gatekeeping: navigating professional contingencies at the pharmacy counter.

作者信息

Chiarello Elizabeth

机构信息

Assistant Professor of sociology at Saint Louis University where she researches institutional influences on health care decision-making.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Winter;42(4):518-34. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12173.

DOI:10.1111/jlme.12173
PMID:25565618
Abstract

This paper theorizes that care provision depends on the set of "contingencies," or organizational and institutional structures, rules, narratives, and routines, surrounding professional work. Drawing on 95 interviews with U.S. pharmacists, I demonstrate how pharmacists prioritize specific contingencies and reveal how ethical decision-making depends on both organizational positioning and locus in inter-professional hierarchies.

摘要

本文提出理论,认为护理服务取决于围绕专业工作的一系列“意外情况”,即组织和制度结构、规则、叙事及常规。通过对95位美国药剂师的访谈,我展示了药剂师如何对特定意外情况进行优先排序,并揭示了道德决策如何既取决于组织定位,又取决于在跨专业层级中的位置。

相似文献

1
Medical versus fiscal gatekeeping: navigating professional contingencies at the pharmacy counter.医疗把关与财务把关:在药房柜台应对专业意外情况
J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Winter;42(4):518-34. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12173.
2
How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: pharmacists' management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings.组织背景如何影响生命伦理决策:药剂师在零售和医院环境中管理把关过程。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:319-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.041. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
3
To dispense or not to dispense? Ethical case decision-making in pharmacy practice.配药还是不配药?药学实践中的伦理案例决策。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Dec;37(6):978-81. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0170-8.
4
Druggists and pharmacists as gatekeepers: sales routines and compliance with sales protocols for over-the-counter naproxen 275 mg medicines in the Netherlands.药剂师作为把关人:荷兰非处方275毫克萘普生药物的销售流程及销售协议的遵守情况
Health Policy. 2014 Sep;117(3):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
5
Ethical decision-making, passivity and pharmacy.伦理决策、被动性与药学
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jun;34(6):441-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022624.
6
Ethics education for contemporary clinical pharmacy practice in Africa.非洲当代临床药学实践的伦理学教育。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2021 Apr-Jun;VI(2):1-7. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.098.
7
[The historical study of an ethics for American pharmacists].[美国药剂师职业道德的历史研究]
Yakushigaku Zasshi. 1999;34(1):13-23.
8
Ethical issues associated with managed care pharmacy services.与管理式医疗药房服务相关的伦理问题。
Top Hosp Pharm Manage. 1990 Nov;10(3):30-8.
9
Thinking about ethical dilemmas in pharmacy.思考药学中的伦理困境。
Am J Pharm Educ. 1986 Summer;50(2):161-4.
10
Ethical decision making in pharmacy.药学中的伦理决策。
Am Pharm. 1993 Sep;NS33(9):48-50. doi: 10.1016/s0160-3450(15)30671-1.

引用本文的文献

1
"Nobody Knows How You're Supposed to Interpret it:" End-user Perspectives on Prescription Drug Monitoring Program in Massachusetts.“没人知道你应该如何解读它”:马萨诸塞州处方药监测计划的终端用户视角。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(3):e171-e176. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000901.
2
Self-reported participation in voluntary nonprescription syringe sales in California's Central Valley.在加利福尼亚州中央谷地,关于自愿参与非处方注射器销售的自我报告。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Nov-Dec;57(6):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Aug 12.