• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年抑郁症治疗中各因素的临床偏好

Clinical preference for factors in treatment of geriatric depression.

作者信息

Riepe Matthias W

机构信息

Mental Health and Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Dec 22;11:25-31. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S75450. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.2147/NDT.S75450
PMID:25565848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4278797/
Abstract

Little is known about symptom preferences of clinical psychiatrists in the treatment of geriatric depression and preferences for avoiding adverse drug effects. Participants (board-certified psychiatrists) were recruited prior to a lecture on geriatric depression during a continuing education program. An analytic hierarchy process was performed and participants were asked for pairwise comparison of criteria guiding them in appraising therapeutic efficacy, and in avoiding toxicity and adverse events. Of the 61 participants from the continuing education program, 42 (69%) returned their data sheet. Avoidance of cardiotoxicity was regarded as more important than avoidance of hepatotoxicity or hematotoxicity. Concerning adverse events, highest preference was given to avoidance of falls and drug interactions, followed by avoidance of sedation, weight change, and impairment of sexual function. The most important preferences for appraisal of therapeutic efficacy were suicidality over ability to concentrate and sleep. Clinical psychiatrists have a hierarchy of preferences for treatment goals and avoidance of adverse events and toxicity. This raises the question for future research whether these preferences cause differences in prescription patterns in clinical practice even though a multitude of antidepressants are similarly effective when judged with instruments used in clinical trials.

摘要

关于临床精神科医生在治疗老年抑郁症时的症状偏好以及避免药物不良反应的偏好,目前所知甚少。在一个继续教育项目中,在一场关于老年抑郁症的讲座之前招募了参与者(获得委员会认证的精神科医生)。进行了层次分析法,并要求参与者对指导他们评估治疗效果以及避免毒性和不良事件的标准进行两两比较。在继续教育项目的61名参与者中,42名(69%)返回了他们的数据表。避免心脏毒性被认为比避免肝毒性或血液毒性更重要。关于不良事件,最优先考虑的是避免跌倒和药物相互作用,其次是避免镇静、体重变化和性功能障碍。评估治疗效果时最重要的偏好是自杀倾向优于注意力集中能力和睡眠。临床精神科医生在治疗目标以及避免不良事件和毒性方面有一个偏好层次。这就引发了未来研究的问题,即尽管在临床试验中使用的工具判断多种抗抑郁药同样有效,但这些偏好是否会导致临床实践中处方模式的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/7a9a4ffc730e/ndt-11-025Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/0a6d7723d5c4/ndt-11-025Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/dab28efc3fa4/ndt-11-025Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/43e856a94d49/ndt-11-025Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/e89978bbdb24/ndt-11-025Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/7a9a4ffc730e/ndt-11-025Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/0a6d7723d5c4/ndt-11-025Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/dab28efc3fa4/ndt-11-025Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/43e856a94d49/ndt-11-025Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/e89978bbdb24/ndt-11-025Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae5/4278797/7a9a4ffc730e/ndt-11-025Fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical preference for factors in treatment of geriatric depression.老年抑郁症治疗中各因素的临床偏好
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Dec 22;11:25-31. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S75450. eCollection 2015.
2
3
[Proper use of novel antidepressants in psychiatric clinical practice].[新型抗抑郁药在精神科临床实践中的合理应用]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2014;116(2):138-43.
4
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
Psychiatrists' psychotropic drug prescription preferences for themselves or their family members.精神科医生给自己或家人开精神类药物的处方偏好。
Psychiatr Danub. 2012 Jun;24(2):182-7.
6
Antidepressant Regulatory Warnings, Prescription Patterns, Suicidality and Other Aggressive Behaviors in Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders.重度抑郁症和焦虑症中的抗抑郁药监管警告、处方模式、自杀倾向及其他攻击性行为
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Jun;87(2):329-42. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9389-8.
7
Which factors influence psychiatrists' selection of antidepressants?哪些因素会影响精神科医生对抗抑郁药的选择?
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1285-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1285.
8
Nonsomatic treatment of depression.抑郁症的非躯体治疗。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002 Jul;11(3):579-93. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00009-3.
9
10
Assessing the Importance of Treatment Goals in Patients with Psoriasis: Analytic Hierarchy Process vs. Likert Scales.评估银屑病患者治疗目标的重要性:层次分析法与李克特量表。
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):425-437. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0300-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining and Using the Utrecht Method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Facilitate Professional and Ethical Deliberation and Decision Making in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Case Study among a Panel of Stakeholders.结合并运用乌得勒支方法与层次分析法,以促进补充与替代医学中的专业与伦理审议及决策:利益相关者小组的案例研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Dec 23;2018:2315938. doi: 10.1155/2018/2315938. eCollection 2018.
2
Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.层次分析法在医疗保健研究中的应用:系统文献综述与报告评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 24;15:112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0234-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicriteria decision analysis in oncology.肿瘤学中的多标准决策分析。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1812-26. doi: 10.1111/hex.12178. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
2
Assessing response to treatment and recognizing residual depressive symptoms.评估治疗反应和识别残留抑郁症状。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;75(1):e01. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13018tx2c.
3
Antidepressant-induced liver injury: a review for clinicians.抗抑郁药相关肝损伤:临床医生的综述。
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;171(4):404-15. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13050709.
4
Cognitive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder and their implications for clinical practice.重性抑郁障碍患者的认知症状及其对临床实践的意义。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;75(1):8-14. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13r08710.
5
"Clinical judgment" and the DSM-5 diagnosis of major depression.“临床判断”与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版对重度抑郁症的诊断
World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):89-91. doi: 10.1002/wps.20049.
6
A systematic review comparing clinical features in early age at onset and late age at onset late-life depression.一项比较早发性和晚发性晚发性抑郁症临床特征的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
7
Patient preferences for outcomes of depression treatment in Germany: a choice-based conjoint analysis study.德国抑郁症治疗结局的患者偏好:基于选择的联合分析研究。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jun;148(2-3):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.062. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
8
Depression treatment preferences of older white and Mexican origin men.老年白人和墨西哥裔男性的抑郁治疗偏好。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jan-Feb;35(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
9
DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses.《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)在美国和加拿大的现场测试,第二部分:部分类别诊断的重测信度。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;170(1):59-70. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070999.
10
Using the analytic hierarchy process to elicit patient preferences: prioritizing multiple outcome measures of antidepressant drug treatment.运用层次分析法获取患者偏好:对多种抗抑郁药物治疗结果指标进行优先级排序。
Patient. 2012;5(4):225-37. doi: 10.1007/BF03262495.