[Comparison of the effectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy versus non-platinum-based chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer with metastases confined to the lungs].

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of first-line treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with lung metastases from triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

Sixty-five eligible patients were divided into platinum-treated group and non-platinum-treated group according to the first-line therapy. Factors predicting the chemotherapeutic efficacy included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response (OR).

RESULTS

In the platinum-treated group of 32 patients, 2 cases (6.3%) achieved CR, 16 cases (50.0%) achieved PR, 11 (34.4%) cases achieved SD, and 3 patients (9.4%) achieved PD. In the non-platinum-treated group of 33 patients, 2 cases (6.1%) achieved CR, 6 cases (18.2%) achieved PR, 16 cases (48.5%) achieved SD, and 9 cases (27.3%) achieved PD. Median PFS was significantly longer in the platinum-treated group than in the non-platinum-treated group (10 months vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.012), and OS was also improved (32 months vs. 22 months, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis of several factors including local-regional lymph node involvement, lung metastasis-related symptoms, first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, disease-free interval, size and number of lung lesions, showed that first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for TNBC patients with lung metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy can improve PFS and OS in TNBC patients with metastases confined to the lungs.