Schiermiester L N, Thallman R M, Kuehn L A, Kachman S D, Spangler M L
Animal Science Department, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583.
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA, ARS), Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center, NE 68933.
J Anim Sci. 2015 Jan;93(1):46-52. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8493.
Heterosis, assumed proportional to expected breed heterozygosity, was calculated for 6834 individuals with birth, weaning and yearling weight records from Cycle VII and advanced generations of the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) Germplasm Evaluation (GPE) project. Breeds represented in these data included: Angus, Hereford, Red Angus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Simmental, Limousin and Composite MARC III. Heterosis was further estimated by proportions of British × British (B × B), British × Continental (B × C) and Continental × Continental (C × C) crosses and by breed-specific combinations. Model 1 fitted fixed covariates for heterosis within biological types while Model 2 fitted random breed-specific combinations nested within the fixed biological type covariates. Direct heritability estimates (SE) for birth, weaning ,and yearling weight for Model 1 were 0.42 (0.04), 0.22 (0.03), and 0.39 (0.05), respectively. The direct heritability estimates (SE) of birth, weaning, and yearling weight for Model 2 were the same as Model 1, except yearling weight heritability was 0.38 (0.05). The B × B, B × C, and C × C heterosis estimates for birth weight were 0.47 (0.37), 0.75 (0.32), and 0.73 (0.54) kg, respectively. The B × B, B × C, and C × C heterosis estimates for weaning weight were 6.43 (1.80), 8.65 (1.54), and 5.86 (2.57) kg, respectively. Yearling weight estimates for B × B, B × C, and C × C heterosis were 17.59(3.06), 13.88 (2.63), and 9.12 (4.34) kg, respectively. Differences did exist among estimates of breed-specific heterosis for weaning and yearling weight, although the variance component associated with breed-specific heterosis was not significant. These results illustrate that there are differences in breed-specific heterosis and exploiting these differences can lead to varying levels of heterosis among mating plans.
杂种优势假定与预期品种杂合度成正比,针对美国肉用动物研究中心(USMARC)种质评估(GPE)项目第七轮及后续世代中6834头有出生、断奶和周岁体重记录的个体进行了计算。这些数据所涵盖的品种包括:安格斯牛、海福特牛、红安格斯牛、夏洛莱牛、吉尔维牛、西门塔尔牛、利木赞牛和复合MARC III。杂种优势还通过英国品种×英国品种(B×B)、英国品种×欧洲大陆品种(B×C)和欧洲大陆品种×欧洲大陆品种(C×C)杂交组合的比例以及特定品种组合来估算。模型1针对生物类型内的杂种优势拟合了固定协变量,而模型2则在固定的生物类型协变量内拟合了嵌套的随机特定品种组合。模型1中出生、断奶和周岁体重的直接遗传力估计值(标准误)分别为0.42(0.04)、0.22(0.03)和0.39(0.05)。模型2中出生、断奶和周岁体重的直接遗传力估计值(标准误)与模型1相同,只是周岁体重的遗传力为0.38(0.05)。出生体重的B×B、B×C和C×C杂种优势估计值分别为0.47(0.37)、0.75(0.32)和0.73(0.54)千克。断奶体重的B×B、B×C和C×C杂种优势估计值分别为6.43(1.80)、8.65(1.54)和5.86(2.57)千克。周岁体重的B×B、B×C和C×C杂种优势估计值分别为17.59(3.06)、13.88(2.63)和9.12(4.34)千克。断奶和周岁体重的特定品种杂种优势估计值之间确实存在差异,尽管与特定品种杂种优势相关的方差分量并不显著。这些结果表明特定品种杂种优势存在差异,并利用这些差异可在交配计划中产生不同程度的杂种优势。