• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度心理学会-世界精神病学协会-世界卫生组织关于《国际疾病分类第 10 版》实用性的调查。

Indian Psychiatric Society-World Psychiatric Association - World Health Organization survey on usefulness of International Classification of Diseases-10.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;56(4):350-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.146522.

DOI:10.4103/0019-5545.146522
PMID:25568475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4279292/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

World Health Organization (WHO) is in the process of revising the International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10). For increasing the acceptability of the ICD-11, WHO along with World Psychiatric Association (WPA), conducted a survey of psychiatrists around the world, in which 386 psychiatrists from India participated.

AIM

To present the findings of "WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes toward Mental Disorders Classification" for Indian psychiatrists who participated in the survey as members of Indian Psychiatric Society.

METHODOLOGY

The online survey was sent to qualified psychiatrists who are members of Indian Psychiatric Society and are residing in India.

RESULTS

Of the 1702 members who were urged to participate in the survey, 386 (22.7%) participated. Most(79%) of the psychiatrists opined that they use formal classificatory systems in their day-to-day clinical practice. ICD-10 was the most commonly (71%) followed classificatory system. Nearly half (48%) felt the need for only 10-30 categories for use in clinical settings and another 44% opined that 31-100 categories are required for use. Most of the participants (85%) suggested that a modified/simpler classificatory system should be designed for primary care practitioners. Similarly, the same number of participants (89%) argued that for maximum utility of a nosological system diagnostic criteria should provide flexible guidance that allows cultural variation and clinical judgement. About 75% opined that the diagnostic system they were using was difficult to apply across cultures.

CONCLUSION

Findings of the survey suggest that classificatory systems are routinely used in day-to-day practice by most of the participating psychiatrists in India and most expect that future classificatory system should provide flexible guidance that allows cultural variation and clinical judgement.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)正在修订《国际疾病分类第 10 版》(ICD-10)。为了提高 ICD-11 的可接受性,世界卫生组织与世界精神病学协会(WPA)一起对世界各地的精神病医生进行了调查,其中有 386 名印度精神病医生参与。

目的

介绍参加调查的印度精神病医生对《世界精神病学协会-世界卫生组织全球精神障碍分类态度调查》的调查结果,他们是印度精神病学会的成员。

方法

这项在线调查发给了有资格的、居住在印度的印度精神病学会成员。

结果

在被敦促参加调查的 1702 名成员中,有 386 名(22.7%)参与了调查。大多数(79%)的精神科医生认为他们在日常临床实践中使用正式的分类系统。ICD-10 是最常用的分类系统(71%)。近一半(48%)的人认为在临床环境中只需要使用 10-30 个类别,另有 44%的人认为需要使用 31-100 个类别。大多数参与者(85%)建议为初级保健医生设计一个改良/简化的分类系统。同样,同样数量的参与者(89%)认为,为了最大限度地利用分类系统,诊断标准应提供灵活的指导,允许文化差异和临床判断。约 75%的人认为他们正在使用的诊断系统在跨文化应用方面存在困难。

结论

调查结果表明,分类系统在印度大多数参与调查的精神病医生的日常实践中得到常规应用,他们大多数期望未来的分类系统应提供灵活的指导,允许文化差异和临床判断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/696d55ed99d2/IJPsy-56-350-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/891801dfbc0a/IJPsy-56-350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/28a5163ce811/IJPsy-56-350-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/696d55ed99d2/IJPsy-56-350-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/891801dfbc0a/IJPsy-56-350-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/28a5163ce811/IJPsy-56-350-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384c/4279292/696d55ed99d2/IJPsy-56-350-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Indian Psychiatric Society-World Psychiatric Association - World Health Organization survey on usefulness of International Classification of Diseases-10.印度心理学会-世界精神病学协会-世界卫生组织关于《国际疾病分类第 10 版》实用性的调查。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;56(4):350-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.146522.
2
Frequency of use of the International Classification of Diseases ICD-10 diagnostic categories for mental and behavioural disorders across world regions.精神和行为障碍国际疾病分类 ICD-10 诊断类别在世界各区域的使用频率。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):568-576. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000683. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
3
The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification.WPA-WHO 全球精神科医生对精神障碍分类态度调查。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;10(2):118-31. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00034.x.
4
[Toward the new classification of mental disorders--Polish psychiatrists' opinions about project of ICD-11].迈向精神障碍的新分类——波兰精神病学家对国际疾病分类第11版项目的看法
Psychiatr Pol. 2011 Nov-Dec;45(6):785-98.
5
Comparison of psychiatrists' views on classification of mental disorders in four East Asian countries/area.比较四位东亚国家/地区精神病医生对精神障碍分类的看法。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2010 Mar;3(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
6
Letter to the Editor: EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE ICD-11 CHAPTER ON MENTAL DISORDERS.致编辑的信:与 ICD-11 精神障碍章节相关的教育活动。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):291-292. doi: 10.5080/u26898.
7
Comparing attitudes towards compulsory interventions in severe and persistent mental illness among psychiatrists in India and Switzerland.比较印度和瑞士精神科医生对严重和持久精神疾病中强制干预的态度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05710-6.
8
Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey.心理健康专业人员使用诊断分类的方式是我们所认为的那样吗?一项全球调查。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/wps.20525.
9
The Use of ICD-10 for Diagnosing Mental Disorders In Russia, According to National Statistics and a Survey of Psychiatrists' Experience.根据俄罗斯国家统计数据及对精神科医生经验的调查,国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)在俄罗斯用于诊断精神障碍的情况
Consort Psychiatr. 2021 May 25;2(2):35-44. doi: 10.17816/CP69. eCollection 2021.
10
Chinese psychiatrists views on global features of CCMD-III, ICD-10 and DSM-IV.中国精神科医生对 CCMD-III、ICD-10 和 DSM-IV 的全球特征的看法。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2008 Dec;1(2):56-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Bipolar disorder in the International Classification of Diseases-Eleventh version: A review of the changes, their basis, and usefulness.《国际疾病分类第十一次修订本中的双相情感障碍:对变化、其依据及实用性的综述》
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 19;12(12):1335-1355. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i12.1335.

本文引用的文献

1
The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification.WPA-WHO 全球精神科医生对精神障碍分类态度调查。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;10(2):118-31. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00034.x.
2
A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders.精神和行为障碍的 ICD-10 分类修订的概念框架。
World Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;10(2):86-92. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00022.x.
3
International surveys on the use of ICD-10 and related diagnostic systems.
关于国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)及相关诊断系统使用情况的调查。
Psychopathology. 2002 Mar-Jun;35(2-3):72-5. doi: 10.1159/000065122.