Nguyen Douglas L, Nguyen Emily T, Bechtold Matthew L
Departments of aMedicine bPharmacy, University of California, Irvine, California cDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;27(3):235-41. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000273.
Several studies have also evaluated the efficacy of initial medical management compared with initial surgical management strategies with regard to abscess resolution with variable results.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of initial medical management compared with surgical management of Crohn's disease (CD)-related intra-abdominal abscesses.
A comprehensive search of multiple databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane databases, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google Scholar) was performed in August 2014.
All studies on adults comparing initial surgical versus medical approaches to treat CD-related abscesses were included.
The durability of abscess resolution and rate of stoma creation between the groups undergoing initial surgical versus medical approaches were compared.
The pooled analysis of the nine studies including a total 603 patients showed an overall rate of abscess resolution were 56.6% in the medical group compared with 80.7% in the surgical group. There was over three-fold higher chance of achieving abscess resolution when an initial surgical strategy was used at the time of abscess diagnosis compared with the medical strategy (odds ratio 3.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.80, 6.58, P<0.001). The number needed to treat using the initial surgical approach to prevent a recurrent abscess was four patients.
All included studies were retrospective case series with potential clinical confounders not fully accounted in the analysis.
Initial surgical management appears to be superior to medical management in patients with CD-related intra-abdominal abscesses. Though all the included studies in this meta-analysis were retrospective, this meta-analysis is likely the strongest level of evidence with regard to the management of CD-related abscesses, given that a randomized-control trial may not be feasible given the low rate of abscess development in CD.
多项研究还比较了初始药物治疗与初始手术治疗策略在脓肿消退方面的疗效,结果各异。
本研究旨在评估与克罗恩病(CD)相关腹腔内脓肿的手术治疗相比,初始药物治疗的疗效。
2014年8月对多个数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane数据库、CINAHL、Scopus和谷歌学术)进行了全面检索。
纳入所有比较成人CD相关脓肿初始手术与药物治疗方法的研究。
比较初始手术与药物治疗组之间脓肿消退的持久性和造口率。
对9项研究(共603例患者)的汇总分析显示,药物治疗组脓肿总体消退率为56.6%,而手术治疗组为80.7%。与药物治疗策略相比,脓肿诊断时采用初始手术策略实现脓肿消退的几率高出三倍多(优势比3.44,95%置信区间:1.80,6.58,P<0.001)。采用初始手术方法预防复发性脓肿所需治疗的患者数为4例。
所有纳入研究均为回顾性病例系列,分析中未充分考虑潜在的临床混杂因素。
对于CD相关腹腔内脓肿患者,初始手术治疗似乎优于药物治疗。尽管本荟萃分析中的所有纳入研究均为回顾性研究,但鉴于CD中脓肿发生率较低,进行随机对照试验可能不可行,因此该荟萃分析可能是关于CD相关脓肿治疗的最强证据级别。