Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal; Cognitive-Behavioral Research Centre (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal; Cognitive-Behavioral Research Centre (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Portugal.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:602-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.054. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
Military combat exposure can be perceived as a great threat to the integrity of soldiers. However, no available assessment tools evaluate the degree of emotional distress that results from the exposure to various combat scenarios. This paper presents the second independent section of the Combat Exposure Questionnaire, the Combat Distress Scale (CEQ B). This questionnaire assesses Veterans׳ subjective emotional distress that is due to objective and typical military combat scenarios during war.
A sample of 708 Portuguese Overseas War Veterans participated. The scale structure of the CEQ B was analyzed with a Rasch Model, and the internal consistency and convergent validity of the scale were studied. The temporal reliability was calculated in a subgroup of 112 participants. Two samples of war Veterans with and without war-related Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (N=40 and N=47, respectively) were used to explore the scale׳s discriminant validity.
Overall, the CEQ B showed an acceptable fit to the data, excellent internal consistency, high temporal stability, adequate convergent validity and suitable discriminant validity.
This study used a population of male war Veterans that did not equally represent genders or the full adult age span, which may hinder the generalization of the results.
The findings indicated that the CEQ B is valid, reliable and supported by convergent and discriminant data. This lends confidence in the use of the measure as an assessment of the subjective emotional distress resulting from exposure to military combat scenarios in clinical and research settings.
军事战斗暴露可被视为对士兵完整性的巨大威胁。然而,目前尚无可用的评估工具来评估因接触各种战斗场景而导致的情绪困扰程度。本文介绍了战斗暴露问卷的第二部分,即战斗困扰量表(CEQ B)。该问卷评估了因战争期间的客观和典型军事战斗场景而导致的退伍军人的主观情绪困扰。
共有 708 名葡萄牙海外战争退伍军人参与了研究。采用 Rasch 模型对 CEQ B 的量表结构进行了分析,并研究了量表的内部一致性和收敛效度。在 112 名参与者的亚组中计算了时间可靠性。使用有和没有战争相关创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人两个样本(分别为 N=40 和 N=47)来探索量表的区分效度。
总体而言,CEQ B 与数据拟合良好,具有良好的内部一致性、高时间稳定性、足够的收敛效度和适当的区分效度。
本研究使用的是男性退伍军人群体,其性别和全成年年龄范围不均等,可能会限制结果的推广。
研究结果表明,CEQ B 具有有效性、可靠性,并得到了收敛和区分数据的支持。这为在临床和研究环境中使用该测量工具评估因接触军事战斗场景而导致的主观情绪困扰提供了信心。