Min Xiaoyi, Kent Alexander R, Rosenberg Stuart P, Fayram Timothy A
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:6246-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945056.
A recently published computational modeling study of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) predicted that a multiple current source (MCS) system could generate a greater number of central points of stimulation in the dorsal column (DC) than a single current source (1 CS) system. However, the clinical relevance of this finding has not been established. The objective of this work was to compare the dermatomal zone selectivity of MCS and 1 CS systems. A finite element method (FEM) model was built with a representation of the spinal cord anatomy and a 2 × 8 paddle electrode array. Using a contact configuration with two aligned tripoles, the FEM model was used to solve for DC field potentials across incremental changes in current between the two cathodes, modeling the MCS and 1 CS systems. The activation regions within the DC were determined by coupling the FEM output to a biophysical nerve fiber model, and coverage was mapped to dermatomal zones. Results showed marginal differences in activated dermatomal zones between 1 CS and MCS systems. This indicates that a MCS system may not provide incremental therapeutic benefit as suggested in prior analysis.
最近发表的一项关于脊髓刺激(SCS)的计算模型研究预测,与单电流源(1 CS)系统相比,多电流源(MCS)系统可在背柱(DC)中产生更多的中枢刺激点。然而,这一发现的临床相关性尚未确立。这项工作的目的是比较MCS和1 CS系统的皮节区选择性。构建了一个有限元方法(FEM)模型,该模型具有脊髓解剖结构和一个2×8的极板电极阵列。使用具有两个对齐三极的接触配置,FEM模型用于求解两个阴极之间电流增量变化时的DC场电位,对MCS和1 CS系统进行建模。通过将FEM输出与生物物理神经纤维模型耦合来确定DC内的激活区域,并将覆盖范围映射到皮节区。结果显示,1 CS和MCS系统之间激活的皮节区存在微小差异。这表明,MCS系统可能无法像先前分析中所暗示的那样提供额外的治疗益处。