Lapmahapaisan Saowaphak, Tantemsapya Niramol, Aroonpruksakul Naiyana, Maisat Wiriya, Suraseranivongse Suwannee
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jun;25(6):614-20. doi: 10.1111/pan.12607. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a promising effective method for postoperative pain control after major abdominal surgery. Using a landmark technique, it is easily performed, but its popularity has decreased because of less efficacy due to inaccurate injection and the potential for intraperitoneal organ damage. Ultrasound-guided TAP block provides better results and less complications, but it requires experienced operators. Surgically administered TAP (sTAP) block is a simple technique and may cause less complications. This study was aimed to determine the efficacy of sTAP on postoperative pain control in pediatric patients following a major abdominal surgery, compared with local anesthetic infiltration and no block.
This stratified, randomized controlled trial was conducted in pediatric patients, below the age of 15 years, who underwent non-laparoscopic major abdominal surgery. Patients were allocated into three groups. The control group received no block; the LA group received 0.25% bupivacaine for local wound infiltration; and the sTAP group received 0.25% bupivacaine for TAP block performed by a surgeon before abdominal wall closure. Parameter records included the incidence of inadequate pain control, time to first analgesic, opioid requirement within 24 h, and complications of these techniques.
Fifty-four patients were recruited. There was no significant difference in the incidence of inadequate pain control (P = 0.589). The median time to first analgesic was 380 min in the sTAP group compared with 370 and 420 min in the LA and control groups, respectively (95%CI = 193-567, 121-619, and 0-1012; P = 0.632). The median dose of total opioid requirement (calculated as fentanyl-equivalent dose) was 1.95, 2.05, and 2.04 μg·kg(-1) ·24 h(-1) in the sTAP, LA, and control groups, respectively (IQR = 0.65, 2.20; 0.59, 3.32; 0.38, 2.60; P = 0.723). No complications of sTAP block were detected.
There was no significant advantage of the sTAP block over local infiltration or no intervention for postoperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing non-laparoscopic major abdominal surgeries.
腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞是一种用于腹部大手术后控制术后疼痛的有效方法。采用体表定位技术操作简便,但由于注射不准确导致效果欠佳以及存在损伤腹腔内器官的风险,其应用已减少。超声引导下TAP阻滞效果更佳且并发症更少,但需要经验丰富的操作人员。外科手术实施的TAP(sTAP)阻滞是一种简单的技术,并发症可能较少。本研究旨在确定sTAP阻滞对接受腹部大手术的儿科患者术后疼痛控制的效果,并与局部麻醉药浸润和不进行阻滞进行比较。
本分层随机对照试验在15岁以下接受非腹腔镜腹部大手术的儿科患者中进行。患者被分为三组。对照组不进行阻滞;局部麻醉药(LA)组接受0.25%布比卡因进行局部伤口浸润;sTAP组在关闭腹壁前由外科医生进行TAP阻滞并注射0.25%布比卡因。记录的参数包括疼痛控制不佳的发生率、首次使用镇痛药的时间、24小时内阿片类药物需求量以及这些技术的并发症。
共招募了54例患者。疼痛控制不佳的发生率无显著差异(P = 0.589)。sTAP组首次使用镇痛药的中位时间为380分钟,而LA组和对照组分别为370分钟和420分钟(95%CI = 193 - 567,121 - 619,0 - 1012;P = 0.632)。sTAP组、LA组和对照组阿片类药物总需求量的中位剂量(以芬太尼等效剂量计算)分别为1.95、2.05和2.04 μg·kg⁻¹·24 h⁻¹(四分位间距 = 0.65,2.20;0.59,3.32;0.38,2.60;P = 0.723)。未检测到sTAP阻滞的并发症。
对于接受非腹腔镜腹部大手术的儿科患者,sTAP阻滞在术后疼痛控制方面相对于局部浸润或不干预并无显著优势。