Andrikopoulos George, Tzeis Stylianos, Asbach Stefan, Semmler Verena, Lennerz Carsten, Solzbach Ulrich, Grebmer Christian, Kloppe Axel, Klein Norbert, Pastromas Socratis, Biermann Jürgen, Kolb Christof
Department of Cardiology, Henry Dunant Hospital, 107 Mesogion Avenue, Athens 115 26, Greece
Department of Cardiology, Henry Dunant Hospital, 107 Mesogion Avenue, Athens 115 26, Greece.
Europace. 2015 Jun;17(6):915-20. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu344. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
Right ventricular (RV) septum is a non-apical site targeted during lead implantation. Electrocardiographic (ECG) recognition of mid-septal lead location is challenging. The aim of the study is to determine ECG correlates of RV mid-septal pacing.
The present study is a pre-specified analysis of a prospective, multicenter study, which randomized recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator to an apical vs. mid-septal RV lead positioning. Following implantation, a 12-lead ECG was recorded during intrinsic rhythm and RV pacing. In total, 227 patients, 121 in the apical group (76.9% males, 67.1 ± 11.3 years) and 106 in the mid-septal group (82.1% males, age 64.7 ± 12.7 years) were included. Apically as compared with septally paced patients had significantly longer paced QRS duration (177.0 ± 25.0 vs. 170.4 ± 21.7, respectively, P = 0.03) and significantly more leftward paced QRS axis (-71.6 ± 33.3° vs. 9.4 ± 86.5°, respectively, P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in the mid-septal as compared with the apical group displayed predominantly positive QRS in lead V6 (62.3 vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001), predominantly positive QRS in any of the inferior leads (53.8 vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001), and a QR pattern in lead aVL (53.3 vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001). These ECG correlates were incorporated in a stepwise algorithm with total sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 90% for the identification of a mid-septal lead location.
A mid-septal lead location may be identified using a simple stepwise algorithm, based on the presence of positive QRS in lead V6, positive QRS in any of the inferior leads, and a QR pattern in lead aVL.
右心室(RV)间隔是导线植入时的一个非心尖部靶点。心电图(ECG)识别间隔中部导线位置具有挑战性。本研究的目的是确定右心室间隔中部起搏的心电图相关因素。
本研究是对一项前瞻性、多中心研究的预先指定分析,该研究将植入式心律转复除颤器接受者随机分为心尖部与间隔中部右心室导线定位组。植入后,在固有心律和右心室起搏期间记录12导联心电图。总共纳入227例患者,心尖部组121例(男性占76.9%,年龄67.1±11.3岁),间隔中部组106例(男性占82.1%,年龄64.7±12.7岁)。与间隔起搏患者相比,心尖部起搏患者的起搏QRS时限显著更长(分别为177.0±25.0与170.4±21.7,P = 0.03),起搏QRS轴显著更偏左(分别为-71.6±33.3°与9.4±86.5°,P < 0.001)。与心尖部组相比,间隔中部组中QRS波在V6导联主要为正向的患者比例显著更高(62.3%对4.1%,P < 0.001),在下壁导联中任何一个导联QRS波主要为正向的患者比例显著更高(53.8%对4.1%,P < 0.001),以及aVL导联呈QR图形的患者比例显著更高(53.3%对3.3%,P < 0.001)。这些心电图相关因素被纳入一个逐步算法中,用于识别间隔中部导线位置的总敏感性为87%,特异性为90%。
基于V6导联QRS波正向、下壁导联中任何一个导联QRS波正向以及aVL导联呈QR图形,可使用一种简单的逐步算法识别间隔中部导线位置。