González Laura, Oria Roger, Botaya Luis, Puig-Vidal Manel, Otero Jorge
SIC-BIO, Bioelectronics and Nanobioengineering Group, Departament d'Electrònica, Universitat de Barcelona, Marti i Franques 1, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Nanotechnology. 2015 Feb 6;26(5):055501. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/5/055501. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
Quartz tuning forks have become popular in nanotechnology applications, especially as sensors for scanning probe microscopy. The sensor's spring constant and the oscillation amplitude are required parameters to evaluate the tip-sample forces; however, there is certain controversy within the research community as to how to arrive at a value for the static spring constant of the device when working in shear mode. Here, we present two different methods based on finite element simulations, to determine the value of the spring constant of the sensors: the amplitude and Cleveland methods. The results obtained using these methods are compared to those using the geometrical method, and show that the latter overestimates the spring constant of the device.
石英音叉在纳米技术应用中已变得很流行,尤其是作为扫描探针显微镜的传感器。传感器的弹簧常数和振荡幅度是评估针尖 - 样品力所需的参数;然而,在研究界对于在剪切模式下工作时如何得出该装置静态弹簧常数的值存在一定争议。在此,我们基于有限元模拟提出两种不同的方法来确定传感器的弹簧常数:幅度法和克利夫兰法。将使用这些方法获得的结果与使用几何方法获得的结果进行比较,结果表明后者高估了该装置的弹簧常数。