Suppr超能文献

“非为我们而设计”:科学博物馆和科学中心如何在社会层面排斥低收入少数族裔群体。

"Not Designed for Us": How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low-Income, Minority Ethnic Groups.

作者信息

Dawson Emily

机构信息

Department of Science & Technology Studies, University College London London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

Sci Educ. 2014 Nov;98(6):981-1008. doi: 10.1002/sce.21133. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

Abstract

This paper explores how people from low-income, minority ethnic groups perceive and experience exclusion from informal science education (ISE) institutions, such as museums and science centers. Drawing on qualitative data from four focus groups, 32 interviews, four accompanied visits to ISE institutions, and field notes, this paper presents an analysis of exclusion from science learning opportunities during visits alongside participants' attitudes, expectations, and conclusions about participation in ISE. Participants came from four community groups in central London: a Sierra Leonean group ( = 21), a Latin American group ( = 18), a Somali group ( = 6), and an Asian group ( = 13). Using a theoretical framework based on the work of Bourdieu, the analysis suggests ISE practices were grounded in expectations about visitors' scientific knowledge, language skills, and finances in ways that were problematic for participants and excluded them from science learning opportunities. It is argued that ISE practices reinforced participants preexisting sense that museums and science centers were "not for us." The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings in relation to previous research on participation in ISE and the potential for developing more inclusive informal science learning opportunities.

摘要

本文探讨了低收入少数族裔群体如何看待和体验被排除在非正式科学教育(ISE)机构之外的情况,这些机构包括博物馆和科学中心。本文利用来自四个焦点小组的定性数据、32次访谈、四次对ISE机构的陪同参观以及实地记录,对参观期间被排除在科学学习机会之外的情况进行了分析,并探讨了参与者对参与ISE的态度、期望和结论。参与者来自伦敦市中心的四个社区群体:一个塞拉利昂群体(21人)、一个拉丁美洲群体(18人)、一个索马里群体(6人)和一个亚洲群体(13人)。基于布迪厄的研究成果构建理论框架,分析表明ISE实践基于对参观者科学知识、语言技能和经济状况的期望,而这些期望对参与者来说存在问题,使他们被排除在科学学习机会之外。有人认为,ISE实践强化了参与者原有的感觉,即博物馆和科学中心“不是为我们准备的”。本文最后讨论了这些发现与之前关于参与ISE的研究的关系,以及开发更具包容性的非正式科学学习机会的潜力。

相似文献

1
3
Investigating accessibility in Latin American science museums and centers.
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2020 Apr 17;92(1):e20191156. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202020191156. eCollection 2020.
4
Science centers: a potential for learning.
Science. 1978 Jan 20;199(4326):270-3. doi: 10.1126/science.619454.
5
Mapping the informal science education landscape: An exploratory study.
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Oct;21(7):865-74. doi: 10.1177/0963662510393606. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
6
So You Want to Share Your Science …. Connecting to the World of Informal Science Learning.
Integr Comp Biol. 2018 Jul 1;58(1):85-93. doi: 10.1093/icb/icy008.
7
Museums, zoos, and gardens: how formal-informal partnerships can impact urban students' performance in science.
Eval Rev. 2014 Dec;38(6):514-45. doi: 10.1177/0193841X14553299. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
Navigating into the future of science museum education: focus on educators' adaptation during COVID-19.
Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2023 Feb 21:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s11422-022-10142-3.
9
Decoding a Complex Visualization in a Science Museum - An Empirical Study.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 Jan;26(1):472-481. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934401. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Science communication, politics and power: Social justice perspectives.
Public Underst Sci. 2025 May;34(4):531-545. doi: 10.1177/09636625251330837. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
3
Digging for Literature on Tailoring Cultural Offers With and for Older People From Ethnic Minority Groups: A Scoping Review.
Lifestyle Med (Hoboken). 2025 Jan;6(1):e70004. doi: 10.1002/lim2.70004. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Towards Fourth-Generation Science Museums: Changing Goals, Changing Roles.
Can J Sci Math and Technol Educ. 2020;20(4):700-714. doi: 10.1007/s42330-020-00128-0. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
5
Developmental Trajectories of Adolescents' Math Motivation: The Role of Mindset and Perceptions of Informal STEM Learning Site Inclusivity.
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jul;53(7):1542-1563. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01949-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
The legacy of language: What we say, and what people hear, when we talk about genomics.
HGG Adv. 2023 Aug 31;4(4):100231. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100231. eCollection 2023 Oct 12.
7
9
STS and science communication: Reflecting on a relationship.
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Apr;31(3):305-313. doi: 10.1177/09636625221075953.

本文引用的文献

1
Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking.
Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):258-61. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00347.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验