Dawson Emily
Department of Science & Technology Studies, University College London London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Sci Educ. 2014 Nov;98(6):981-1008. doi: 10.1002/sce.21133. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
This paper explores how people from low-income, minority ethnic groups perceive and experience exclusion from informal science education (ISE) institutions, such as museums and science centers. Drawing on qualitative data from four focus groups, 32 interviews, four accompanied visits to ISE institutions, and field notes, this paper presents an analysis of exclusion from science learning opportunities during visits alongside participants' attitudes, expectations, and conclusions about participation in ISE. Participants came from four community groups in central London: a Sierra Leonean group ( = 21), a Latin American group ( = 18), a Somali group ( = 6), and an Asian group ( = 13). Using a theoretical framework based on the work of Bourdieu, the analysis suggests ISE practices were grounded in expectations about visitors' scientific knowledge, language skills, and finances in ways that were problematic for participants and excluded them from science learning opportunities. It is argued that ISE practices reinforced participants preexisting sense that museums and science centers were "not for us." The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings in relation to previous research on participation in ISE and the potential for developing more inclusive informal science learning opportunities.
本文探讨了低收入少数族裔群体如何看待和体验被排除在非正式科学教育(ISE)机构之外的情况,这些机构包括博物馆和科学中心。本文利用来自四个焦点小组的定性数据、32次访谈、四次对ISE机构的陪同参观以及实地记录,对参观期间被排除在科学学习机会之外的情况进行了分析,并探讨了参与者对参与ISE的态度、期望和结论。参与者来自伦敦市中心的四个社区群体:一个塞拉利昂群体(21人)、一个拉丁美洲群体(18人)、一个索马里群体(6人)和一个亚洲群体(13人)。基于布迪厄的研究成果构建理论框架,分析表明ISE实践基于对参观者科学知识、语言技能和经济状况的期望,而这些期望对参与者来说存在问题,使他们被排除在科学学习机会之外。有人认为,ISE实践强化了参与者原有的感觉,即博物馆和科学中心“不是为我们准备的”。本文最后讨论了这些发现与之前关于参与ISE的研究的关系,以及开发更具包容性的非正式科学学习机会的潜力。