• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups.重新构想公众与(非)参与:通过低收入少数族裔群体的经历探索科学传播中的排斥现象。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Oct;27(7):772-786. doi: 10.1177/0963662517750072. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
2
"Not Designed for Us": How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low-Income, Minority Ethnic Groups.“非为我们而设计”:科学博物馆和科学中心如何在社会层面排斥低收入少数族裔群体。
Sci Educ. 2014 Nov;98(6):981-1008. doi: 10.1002/sce.21133. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
3
Constructing publics in museums' science communication.在博物馆的科学传播中构建公众
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Nov;28(8):958-972. doi: 10.1177/0963662519870692. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Distrust and patients in intercultural healthcare: A qualitative interview study.不信任与跨文化医疗保健中的患者:一项定性访谈研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 May;25(3):313-323. doi: 10.1177/0969733016652449. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.生态效度与公众研究:有机公众参与方法的实例
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):77-91. doi: 10.1177/0963662513493575. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.从“信任我们”到参与式治理:协商性公众与科学政策。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0963662512472160.
7
8
The disengaged in science communication: How not to count audiences and publics.科学传播中的脱离者:如何不计算受众和公众。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Feb;27(2):118-130. doi: 10.1177/0963662516678351. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
9
An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.社会与风险在异种移植中的作用概述。
Xenotransplantation. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):523-32. doi: 10.1111/xen.12120. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
10
Explaining the continuum of social participation among older adults in Singapore: from 'closed doors' to active ageing in multi-ethnic community settings.解读新加坡老年人社会参与的连续性:从“闭门不出”到多民族社区环境中的积极老龄化
J Aging Stud. 2017 Aug;42:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Science communication, politics and power: Social justice perspectives.科学传播、政治与权力:社会正义视角
Public Underst Sci. 2025 May;34(4):531-545. doi: 10.1177/09636625251330837. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Modifying the CREATE method with inclusive approaches helps students engage with socioscientific applications of the primary scientific literature.采用包容性方法修改“创建”方法有助于学生参与到初级科学文献的社会科学应用中。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2025 Apr 17:e0007825. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00078-25.
3
Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health Research: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.健康研究简明语言摘要中的术语与可读性:横断面观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 13;27:e50862. doi: 10.2196/50862.
4
What are we talking about when we are talking about the audience? Exploring the concept of audience in science communication research and education.当我们谈论受众时,我们在谈论什么?探索科学传播研究与教育中的受众概念。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 May;34(4):408-423. doi: 10.1177/09636625241280349. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
Constructing the public in public perceptions research: A case study of forest genomics.在公众认知研究中构建公众:以森林基因组学为例
Public Underst Sci. 2024 May;33(4):483-503. doi: 10.1177/09636625231210453. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
The legacy of language: What we say, and what people hear, when we talk about genomics.语言的传承:当我们谈论基因组学时,我们所说的和人们所听到的。
HGG Adv. 2023 Aug 31;4(4):100231. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2023.100231. eCollection 2023 Oct 12.
7
University student-led public engagement event: increasing audience diversity and impact in a non-science space.大学生主导的公众参与活动:在非科学领域增加受众多样性并扩大影响力。
Access Microbiol. 2023 Aug 29;5(8). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000534.v3. eCollection 2023.
8
Mapping research on the social impact of the arts: what characterises the field?关于艺术社会影响的映射研究:该领域的特点是什么?
Open Res Eur. 2022 Aug 18;1:124. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14147.2. eCollection 2021.
9
Promoting Science Literacy and Awareness across the Globe: the Role of Scientists as Science Ambassadors.在全球范围内提升科学素养与意识:科学家作为科学大使的角色。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Apr 25;24(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00041-23. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Broadening participation in science through arts-facilitated experiences at a cultural festival.通过文化节中的艺术促进体验,拓宽科学参与度。
PLoS One. 2023 May 8;18(5):e0284432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284432. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Social justice and out-of-school science learning: Exploring equity in science television, science clubs and maker spaces.社会正义与校外科学学习:探索科学电视、科学俱乐部和创客空间中的公平性。
Sci Educ. 2017 Jul;101(4):539-547. doi: 10.1002/sce.21288. Epub 2017 May 29.
2
Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations.技术科学、想象的公众与公众想象
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Feb;26(2):133-147. doi: 10.1177/0963662516663057.
3
The disengaged in science communication: How not to count audiences and publics.科学传播中的脱离者:如何不计算受众和公众。
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Feb;27(2):118-130. doi: 10.1177/0963662516678351. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
"Not Designed for Us": How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low-Income, Minority Ethnic Groups.“非为我们而设计”:科学博物馆和科学中心如何在社会层面排斥低收入少数族裔群体。
Sci Educ. 2014 Nov;98(6):981-1008. doi: 10.1002/sce.21133. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Why should we promote public engagement with science?我们为什么要促进公众参与科学?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.
6
The influence of cultural capital on consumption of scientific culture: A survey of visitors to an open house event at a public scientific research institution.文化资本对科学文化消费的影响:对某公立科研机构开放日活动参观者的调查。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Apr;22(3):321-34. doi: 10.1177/0963662511409509. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
7
Science in the everyday world: Why perspectives from the history of science matter.日常世界中的科学:为何科学史视角至关重要。
Isis. 2008 Jun;99(2):350-64. doi: 10.1086/588693.

重新构想公众与(非)参与:通过低收入少数族裔群体的经历探索科学传播中的排斥现象。

Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups.

作者信息

Dawson Emily

机构信息

University College London, UK.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2018 Oct;27(7):772-786. doi: 10.1177/0963662517750072. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1177/0963662517750072
PMID:29316863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6154219/
Abstract

This article explores science communication from the perspective of those most at risk of exclusion, drawing on ethnographic fieldwork. I conducted five focus groups and 32 interviews with participants from low-income, minority ethnic backgrounds. Using theories of social reproduction and social justice, I argue that participation in science communication is marked by structural inequalities (particularly ethnicity and class) in two ways. First, participants' involvement in science communication practices was narrow (limited to science media consumption). Second, their experiences of exclusion centred on cultural imperialism (misrepresentation and 'Othering') and powerlessness (being unable to participate or change the terms of their participation). I argue that social reproduction in science communication constructs a narrow public that reflects the shape, values and practices of dominant groups, at the expense of the marginalised. The article contributes to how we might reimagine science communication's publics by taking inclusion/exclusion and the effects of structural inequalities into account.

摘要

本文借助人种志田野调查,从最易被排斥的群体的视角探讨科学传播。我组织了五个焦点小组,并对来自低收入、少数族裔背景的参与者进行了32次访谈。运用社会再生产和社会正义理论,我认为参与科学传播存在两种结构性不平等(尤其是种族和阶级方面)。首先,参与者对科学传播实践的参与较为有限(仅限于科学媒体消费)。其次,他们被排斥的经历集中在文化帝国主义(错误表述和“他者化”)以及无力感(无法参与或改变参与的条件)上。我认为科学传播中的社会再生产构建了一个狭隘的公众群体,这个群体反映了主导群体的形态、价值观和实践,却以边缘化群体为代价。本文有助于我们思考如何通过考虑包容/排斥以及结构性不平等的影响来重新构想科学传播的受众群体。