Dawson Emily
University College London, UK.
Public Underst Sci. 2018 Oct;27(7):772-786. doi: 10.1177/0963662517750072. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
This article explores science communication from the perspective of those most at risk of exclusion, drawing on ethnographic fieldwork. I conducted five focus groups and 32 interviews with participants from low-income, minority ethnic backgrounds. Using theories of social reproduction and social justice, I argue that participation in science communication is marked by structural inequalities (particularly ethnicity and class) in two ways. First, participants' involvement in science communication practices was narrow (limited to science media consumption). Second, their experiences of exclusion centred on cultural imperialism (misrepresentation and 'Othering') and powerlessness (being unable to participate or change the terms of their participation). I argue that social reproduction in science communication constructs a narrow public that reflects the shape, values and practices of dominant groups, at the expense of the marginalised. The article contributes to how we might reimagine science communication's publics by taking inclusion/exclusion and the effects of structural inequalities into account.
本文借助人种志田野调查,从最易被排斥的群体的视角探讨科学传播。我组织了五个焦点小组,并对来自低收入、少数族裔背景的参与者进行了32次访谈。运用社会再生产和社会正义理论,我认为参与科学传播存在两种结构性不平等(尤其是种族和阶级方面)。首先,参与者对科学传播实践的参与较为有限(仅限于科学媒体消费)。其次,他们被排斥的经历集中在文化帝国主义(错误表述和“他者化”)以及无力感(无法参与或改变参与的条件)上。我认为科学传播中的社会再生产构建了一个狭隘的公众群体,这个群体反映了主导群体的形态、价值观和实践,却以边缘化群体为代价。本文有助于我们思考如何通过考虑包容/排斥以及结构性不平等的影响来重新构想科学传播的受众群体。