• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项为期8周的膝关节骨关节炎治疗方案,包括透明质酸注射、精心设计的身体康复训练和患者教育,在2年随访期内具有成本效益:美国骨关节炎中心(SM)的经验。

An 8-Week Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Program of Hyaluronic Acid Injection, Deliberate Physical Rehabilitation, and Patient Education is Cost Effective at 2 Years Follow-up: The OsteoArthritis Centers of America(SM) Experience.

作者信息

Miller Larry E, Block Jon E

机构信息

Miller Scientific Consulting, Inc., Asheville, NC, USA. ; The Jon Block Group, San Francisco, CA, USA.

The Jon Block Group, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 22;7:49-55. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S18356. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.4137/CMAMD.S18356
PMID:25574144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4275112/
Abstract

Numerous nonsurgical interventions have been reported to improve symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA) over the short term. However, longer follow-up is required to accurately characterize outcomes such as cost effectiveness and delayed arthroplasty. A total of 553 patients with symptomatic knee OA who previously underwent a single 8-week multimodal treatment program were contacted at 1 year (n = 336) or 2 years (n = 217) follow-up. The percentage of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty was 10% at 1 year and 18% at 2 years following program completion. The treatment program was highly cost effective at $12,800 per quality-adjusted life year at 2 years. Cost effectiveness was maintained under a variety of plausible assumptions and regardless of gender, age, body mass index, disease severity, or knee pain severity. In summary, a single 8-week multimodal knee OA treatment program is cost effective and may lower knee arthroplasty utilization through 2 years follow-up.

摘要

据报道,许多非手术干预措施在短期内可改善膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的症状。然而,需要更长时间的随访才能准确描述诸如成本效益和延迟关节置换等结果。共有553例有症状的膝关节OA患者,他们之前接受了为期8周的单一多模式治疗方案,并在1年(n = 336)或2年(n = 217)随访时被联系。在治疗方案完成后1年,接受膝关节置换术的患者比例为10%,2年时为18%。该治疗方案在2年时具有很高的成本效益,每质量调整生命年为12,800美元。在各种合理假设下,无论性别、年龄、体重指数、疾病严重程度或膝关节疼痛严重程度如何,成本效益均得以维持。总之,一个为期8周的单一多模式膝关节OA治疗方案具有成本效益,并且在2年的随访期内可能会降低膝关节置换术的使用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8e/4275112/5b7024c27c44/cmamd-7-2014-049f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8e/4275112/476d89dcb3d3/cmamd-7-2014-049f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8e/4275112/5b7024c27c44/cmamd-7-2014-049f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8e/4275112/476d89dcb3d3/cmamd-7-2014-049f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da8e/4275112/5b7024c27c44/cmamd-7-2014-049f2.jpg

相似文献

1
An 8-Week Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Program of Hyaluronic Acid Injection, Deliberate Physical Rehabilitation, and Patient Education is Cost Effective at 2 Years Follow-up: The OsteoArthritis Centers of America(SM) Experience.一项为期8周的膝关节骨关节炎治疗方案,包括透明质酸注射、精心设计的身体康复训练和患者教育,在2年随访期内具有成本效益:美国骨关节炎中心(SM)的经验。
Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 22;7:49-55. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S18356. eCollection 2014.
2
Long-term clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of an 8-week multimodal knee osteoarthritis management program incorporating intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) injections.一项为期8周、包含关节内注射透明质酸钠(海乐妙)的多模式膝关节骨关节炎管理计划的长期临床益处和成本效益。
J Pain Res. 2017 May 5;10:1045-1054. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S132497. eCollection 2017.
3
An 8-week multimodal treatment program improves symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a real-world multicenter experience.一项为期8周的多模式治疗方案可改善膝关节骨关节炎症状:一项真实世界的多中心经验。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2013 Oct 24;4:39-44. doi: 10.2147/POR.S53608. eCollection 2013.
4
Cost analysis of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate treatment in knee osteoarthritis patients who failed conservative treatment.关节内注射透明质酸钠治疗保守治疗失败的膝骨关节炎患者的成本分析。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Sep;90(9):1839-44.
5
Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,局灶性症状性脊柱狭窄手术治疗后健康相关生活质量的评估。
Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
6
Randomised controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of water-based therapy for lower limb osteoarthritis.下肢骨关节炎水基疗法成本效益的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Aug;9(31):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-114. doi: 10.3310/hta9310.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Early to Moderate Stage Knee Osteoarthritis with Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Conservative Interventions.与保守治疗相比,用关节内透明质酸治疗早期至中期膝关节骨关节炎的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jan;37(1):344-352. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01142-x. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
8
Patellofemoral arthroplasty is cheaper and more effective in the short term than total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized trial.髌股关节置换术在短期内在治疗孤立性髌股关节炎方面比全膝关节置换术更便宜且更有效:基于随机试验的成本效益分析。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):449-457. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2018-1580.R3.
9
Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.与髋或膝关节骨关节炎相比,手术治疗局限性腰椎椎管狭窄症的比较结果和成本效用:第 2 部分——估计终生增量成本效用比。
Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment.膝关节骨关节炎治疗的成本效益分析
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Jul-Aug;110(4):368-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Biochemical Implications of Hyaluronic Acid in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Review.透明质酸在肌肉骨骼康复中的临床及生化意义:综述
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 26;13(12):1647. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121647.
2
Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid for Osteoarthritis of the Knee in the United States: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.美国膝关节骨关节炎关节腔内注射透明质酸的经济学评价系统综述
Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 19;14:11795441211047284. doi: 10.1177/11795441211047284. eCollection 2021.
3
Importance of Rehabilitation in Primary Knee Osteoarthritis.

本文引用的文献

1
An 8-week multimodal treatment program improves symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a real-world multicenter experience.一项为期8周的多模式治疗方案可改善膝关节骨关节炎症状:一项真实世界的多中心经验。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2013 Oct 24;4:39-44. doi: 10.2147/POR.S53608. eCollection 2013.
2
Early knee osteoarthritis management should first address mechanical joint overload.早期膝关节骨关节炎的管理应首先解决关节机械性负荷过重问题。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014 Mar 18;6(1):5188. doi: 10.4081/or.2014.5188. eCollection 2014 Jan 20.
3
US-Approved Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injections are Safe and Effective in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Saline-Controlled Trials.
康复在原发性膝关节骨关节炎中的重要性。
Curr Health Sci J. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):148-155. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.45.02.04. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
4
Cost Effectiveness of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid and Disease-Modifying Drugs in Knee Osteoarthritis.关节内透明质酸与改善病情药物治疗膝骨关节炎的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Nov;36(11):1321-1331. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0695-5.
5
Long-term clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of an 8-week multimodal knee osteoarthritis management program incorporating intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) injections.一项为期8周、包含关节内注射透明质酸钠(海乐妙)的多模式膝关节骨关节炎管理计划的长期临床益处和成本效益。
J Pain Res. 2017 May 5;10:1045-1054. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S132497. eCollection 2017.
6
Use of Intraarticular Hyaluronic Acid in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis in Clinical Practice.关节腔内注射透明质酸在临床实践中治疗膝关节骨关节炎的应用。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Sep;69(9):1287-1296. doi: 10.1002/acr.23204. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
7
Assessing the external validity of algorithms to estimate EQ-5D-3L from the WOMAC.评估从WOMAC量表估算EQ-5D-3L量表的算法的外部效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Oct 4;14(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0547-y.
8
Safety of Repeated Injections of Sodium Hyaluronate (SUPARTZ) for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.重复注射透明质酸钠(施沛特)治疗膝关节骨关节炎的安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cartilage. 2016 Oct;7(4):322-32. doi: 10.1177/1947603516642271. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
[Injection treatment with hyaluronic acid].[透明质酸注射治疗]
Z Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;74(9):764-73. doi: 10.1007/s00393-015-1625-y.
美国批准的关节内注射透明质酸对膝骨关节炎患者安全有效:随机盐水对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Sep 1;6:57-63. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S12743. eCollection 2013.
4
Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition.膝关节骨关节炎的治疗:循证指南,第 2 版。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;21(9):571-6. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-21-09-571.
5
Conservative management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a flawed strategy?症状性膝关节骨关节炎的保守治疗:一种有缺陷的策略?
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Feb 22;5(1):e2. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e2.
6
Viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis.膝关节骨关节炎的黏弹性补充治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Aug 7;157(3):180-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-3-201208070-00473.
7
Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review.超声引导下膝关节腔内注射的临床应用:综述。
Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:89-95. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S29265. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Cost-effectiveness of nonpharmacologic, nonsurgical interventions for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: systematic review.非药物、非手术干预治疗髋和/或膝骨关节炎的成本效益:系统评价。
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
Expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcome of patients after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后患者的期望、满意度和临床结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Sep;19(9):1433-41. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1621-y. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
10
Clinical and economic consequences of the treatment gap in knee osteoarthritis management.膝关节骨关节炎管理治疗差距的临床和经济后果。
Med Hypotheses. 2011 Jun;76(6):887-92. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.02.044. Epub 2011 Mar 25.