Kong Mingjian, Guo Ran, Chen Jianqing, Li Peng, Wu Zhen
Department of Anesthesia, Jiangyin Hospital, Medical College of Southeast University, No. 163, Shoushan Rd, Jiangyin, 214400, China.
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 Jun;72(2):567-70. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0503-6.
The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided block of femoral nerve or fascia iliaca compartment in patients who underwent patella fracture surgery. Fifty patients were blinded and randomized into groups treated with continuous fascia iliaca compartment block (CFICB) (n = 25) or continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) (n = 25) after patella fracture surgery. Analgesic effects of the two methods were assessed and compared. Patients from the two groups showed no significant difference in visible analog scales at rest and during movement, fentanyl consumption, nausea, and vomiting. The time of catheter insertion was significantly shorter in carrying out CFICB compared to that in performing CFNB (8.3 ± 1.4 vs 14.5 ± 3.0 min). Three of the 25 patients in CFNB group experienced dysesthesia of anterior of the thigh, a complication which was not observed in CFICB-treated patients. CFICB and CFNB were equally effective in relieving pain after the patella fracture surgery. However, compared to CFNB, CFICB was found to be safer and easier to perform.
本研究的目的是比较超声引导下股神经阻滞或髂筋膜间隙阻滞对髌骨骨折手术患者的镇痛效果。50例患者被随机分为两组,每组25例,分别在髌骨骨折手术后接受连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞(CFICB)或连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)治疗。对两种方法的镇痛效果进行评估和比较。两组患者在静息和活动时的视觉模拟评分、芬太尼用量、恶心和呕吐方面均无显著差异。与CFNB相比,CFICB的置管时间明显更短(8.3±1.4分钟对14.5±3.0分钟)。CFNB组25例患者中有3例出现大腿前部感觉异常,而CFICB治疗的患者未观察到该并发症。CFICB和CFNB在缓解髌骨骨折手术后疼痛方面同样有效。然而,与CFNB相比,CFICB更安全且操作更简便。