• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

17世纪与18世纪之交平衡与动力学之间的关系

[Relations between equilibrium and dynamics at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries].

作者信息

Schmit Christophe

机构信息

CNRS - Observatoire de Paris.

出版信息

Early Sci Med. 2014;19(6):505-48. doi: 10.1163/15733823-00196p01.

DOI:10.1163/15733823-00196p01
PMID:25577927
Abstract

This article investigates the reception of Galileo and Descartes' principles of statics in the works of some French scientists in the second half of seventeenth century, tracing their importance for the genesis of a concept of force. Through an examination of the link between statics and dynamics--especially concerning the phenomena of collision and the motion of falling bodies--it will be shown, first, that these principles of statics actually contributed to the genesis of dynamics; secondly, that the authors examined in this article managed to unify the various fields of mechanics by building a common axiomatic basis, and, thirdly, that there exists a conceptual identity between actions in engines and actions in dynamic phenomena. The evidence brought fourth in this articles challenges the view according to which statics, and more particularly the law of the lever, was an obstacle for the development of dynamics, and particularly for the conceptualization of force.

摘要

本文考察了17世纪下半叶一些法国科学家的著作中对伽利略和笛卡尔静力学原理的接受情况,追溯了这些原理对力概念形成的重要性。通过研究静力学与动力学之间的联系——尤其是关于碰撞现象和落体运动——将表明,首先,这些静力学原理实际上促成了动力学的形成;其次,本文所考察的作者们通过建立一个共同的公理基础成功地统一了力学的各个领域;第三,发动机中的作用与动力学现象中的作用之间存在概念上的一致性。本文提出的证据挑战了这样一种观点,即静力学,尤其是杠杆定律,是动力学发展的障碍,尤其是对力的概念化的障碍。

相似文献

1
[Relations between equilibrium and dynamics at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries].17世纪与18世纪之交平衡与动力学之间的关系
Early Sci Med. 2014;19(6):505-48. doi: 10.1163/15733823-00196p01.
2
Space and motion in nature and Scripture: Galileo, Descartes, Newton.自然与圣经中的空间和运动:伽利略、笛卡尔、牛顿。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2015 Jun;51:89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
3
Qualitative novelty in seventeenth-century science: Hydrostatics from Stevin to Pascal.17世纪科学中的质性创新:从斯蒂文到帕斯卡的流体静力学
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2015 Jun;51:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
4
Experimental history: swinging pendulums and melting shellac.实验历史:摆动的钟摆与融化的虫胶。
Endeavour. 2009 Sep;33(3):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
5
The Cartesian doctor, François Bayle (1622-1709), on psychosomatic explanation.笛卡尔派医生弗朗索瓦·贝耶(1622 - 1709)论身心解释。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Jun;42(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
6
'One common matter' in Descartes' physics: the Cartesian concepts of matter quantities, weight and gravity.
Ann Sci. 2019 Jul-Oct;76(3-4):324-339. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2019.1709899. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
7
Attempts by Descartes and Roberval to evaluate the centre of oscillation of compound pendulums.笛卡尔和罗贝瓦尔对复摆摆动中心进行评估的尝试。
Early Sci Med. 2014;19(3):211-35. doi: 10.1163/15733823-00193p01.
8
Descartes' error.笛卡尔的错误。
J AAPOS. 1998 Feb;2(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(98)90101-x.
9
[The reproduction of the population in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries. Examples from France and Quebec].
Ann Demogr Hist (Paris). 1995:137-48.
10
[The history of non-motion between physics and metaphysics (relativity problematics before Einstein)].[物理学与形而上学之间非运动的历史(爱因斯坦之前的相对论问题)]
Med Secoli. 1981 Jan-Apr;18(1):19-42.