Patil Vijay Maruti, Noronha Vanita, Joshi Amit, Muddu Vamshi Krishna, Dhumal Sachin, Bhosale Bharatsingh, Arya Supreeta, Juvekar Shashikant, Banavali Shripad, D'Cruz Anil, Bhattacharjee Atanu, Prabhash Kumar
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Department of Radio Diagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Oral Oncol. 2015 Mar;51(3):279-86. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
Cetuximab based treatment is the recommended chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell cancers in the palliative setting. However, due to financial constraints, intravenous (IV) chemotherapy without cetuximab is commonly used in lesser developed countries. We believe that oral metronomic chemotherapy may be safer and more effective in this setting.
We conducted an open label, superiority, parallel design, randomized phase II trial comparing oral MCT [daily celecoxib (200mg twice daily) and weekly methotrexate (15mg/m(2))] to intravenous single agent cisplatin (IP) (75mg/m(2)) given 3 weekly. Eligible patients had head and neck cancers requiring palliative chemotherapy with ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate organ functions who could not afford cetuximab. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
110 Patients were recruited between July 2011 to May 2013, 57 randomized to the MCT arm and 53 to the IP arm. Patients in the MCT arm had significantly longer PFS (median 101 days, 95% CI: 58.2-143.7 days) compared to the IP arm (median 66 days, 95% CI; 55.8-76.1 days) (p=0.014). The overall survival (OS) was also increased significantly in the MCT arm (median 249 days, 95% CI: 222.5-275.5 days) compared to the IP arm (median 152 days, 95% CI: 104.2-199.8 days) (p=0.02). There were fewer grade 3/4 adverse effects with MCT, which was not significant. (18.9% vs. 31.4%, P=0.14).
Oral metronomic chemotherapy has significantly better PFS and OS than single agent platinum in the palliative setting.
在姑息治疗中,基于西妥昔单抗的治疗是头颈部鳞状细胞癌推荐的化疗方案。然而,由于经济限制,在欠发达国家,常使用不含西妥昔单抗的静脉化疗。我们认为在这种情况下口服节拍化疗可能更安全且更有效。
我们开展了一项开放标签、优效性、平行设计的随机II期试验,比较口服节拍化疗(每日塞来昔布200mg,每日两次,以及每周甲氨蝶呤15mg/m²)与每3周一次静脉给予单药顺铂(75mg/m²)。符合条件的患者为患有头颈部癌症、需要姑息化疗、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为0 - 2且器官功能良好但负担不起西妥昔单抗的患者。主要终点为无进展生存期。
2011年7月至2013年5月招募了110例患者,57例随机分配至口服节拍化疗组,53例分配至静脉顺铂组。口服节拍化疗组患者的无进展生存期显著长于静脉顺铂组(中位101天,95%置信区间:58.2 - 143.7天),而静脉顺铂组为(中位66天,95%置信区间;55.8 - 76.1天)(p = 0.014)。口服节拍化疗组的总生存期也显著延长(中位249天,95%置信区间:222.5 - 275.5天),相比静脉顺铂组(中位152天,95%置信区间:104.2 - 199.8天)(p = 0.02)。口服节拍化疗的3/4级不良反应较少,但差异无统计学意义。(18.9%对31.4%,P = 0.14)。
在姑息治疗中,口服节拍化疗的无进展生存期和总生存期显著优于单药铂类化疗。