Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
Am J Hematol. 2015 Apr;90(4):E60-5. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23936. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
Bortezomib and lenalidomide are increasingly used in patients with AL amyloidosis, but long term data on their use as primary therapy in AL amyloidosis are lacking while early mortality remains significant. Thus, we analyzed the long term outcomes of 85 consecutive unselected patients, which received primary therapy with bortezomib or lenalidomide and we prospectively evaluated a risk adapted strategy based on bortezomib/dexamethasone to reduce early mortality. Twenty-six patients received full-dose bortezomib/dexamethasone, 36 patients lenalidomide with oral cyclophosphamide and low-dose dexamethasone and 23 patients received bortezomib/dexamethasone at a dose and schedule adjusted to the risk of early death. On intent to treat, 67% of patients achieved a hematologic response (24% hemCRs) and 34% an organ response; both were more frequent with bortezomib. An early death occurred in 20%: in 36% of those treated with full-dose bortezomib/dexamethasone, in 22% of lenalidomide-treated patients but only in 4.5% of patients treated with risk-adapted bortezomib/dexamethasone. Activity of full vs. adjusted dose bortezomib/dexamethasone was similar; twice weekly vs. weekly administration of bortezomib also had similar activity. After a median follow up of 57 months, median survival is 47 months and is similar for patients treated with bortezomib vs. lenalidomide-based regimens. However, risk adjusted-bortezomib/dexamethasone was associated with improved 1-year survival vs. full-dose bortezomib/dexamethasone or lenalidomide-based therapy (81% vs. 56% vs. 53%, respectively). In conclusion, risk-adapted bortezomib/dexamethasone may reduce early mortality and preserve activity while long term follow up indicates that remissions obtained with lenalidomide or bortezomib may be durable, even without consolidation with alkylators.
硼替佐米和来那度胺在淀粉样变性患者中越来越多地使用,但缺乏关于它们作为淀粉样变性主要治疗的长期数据,而早期死亡率仍然很高。因此,我们分析了 85 例连续未选择的患者的长期结果,这些患者接受了硼替佐米或来那度胺的主要治疗,我们前瞻性地评估了基于硼替佐米/地塞米松的风险适应策略,以降低早期死亡率。26 例患者接受了全剂量硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗,36 例患者接受了来那度胺联合口服环磷酰胺和低剂量地塞米松治疗,23 例患者接受了剂量和方案调整至早期死亡风险的硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗。意向治疗中,67%的患者达到血液学缓解(24%的患者达到完全缓解),34%的患者达到器官缓解;硼替佐米治疗的缓解率更高。20%的患者发生早期死亡:全剂量硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗的患者中,36%发生早期死亡,来那度胺治疗的患者中,22%发生早期死亡,但仅在接受风险调整硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗的患者中,4.5%发生早期死亡。全剂量与调整剂量硼替佐米/地塞米松的疗效相似;硼替佐米每周两次给药与每周一次给药的疗效也相似。在中位随访 57 个月后,中位生存期为 47 个月,接受硼替佐米治疗的患者与接受来那度胺为基础的治疗方案的患者相似。然而,与全剂量硼替佐米/地塞米松或来那度胺为基础的治疗相比,风险调整硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗可提高 1 年生存率(81% vs. 56% vs. 53%)。总之,风险调整硼替佐米/地塞米松治疗可能降低早期死亡率并保持疗效,而长期随访表明,接受来那度胺或硼替佐米治疗的缓解可能是持久的,即使不进行烷化剂巩固治疗。