Deloian Barbar J, Lewin Lind Orki, O'Connor Mar E
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;44(1):77-86. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12534. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
To evaluate the baseline knowledge and knowledge gained of nurses, nursing students, midwives, and nurse practitioners who completed Breastfeeding Basics, an online educational program.
This study reports on an anonymous evaluation of an online breastfeeding education program developed and maintained to promote evidence-based breastfeeding practice.
Included in the study were 3736 nurses, 728 nurse practitioners/midwives, and 3106 nursing students from the United States who completed ≥ one pretest or posttest on the Breastfeeding Basics website between April 1999 and December 31, 2011.
Baseline scores were analyzed to determine if nurses' baseline knowledge varied by selected demographic variables such as age, gender, professional level, personal or partner breastfeeding experience, and whether they were required to complete the website for a job or school requirement and to determine knowledge gaps. Pretest and posttest scores on all modules and in specific questions with low pretest scores were compared as a measure of knowledge gained.
Lower median pretest scores were found in student nurses (71%), males (71%), those required to take the course (75%), and those without personal breastfeeding experience (72%). The modules with the lowest median pretest scores were Anatomy/Physiology (67%), Growth and Development of the Breastfed Infant (67%), the Breastfeeding Couple (73%), and the Term Infant with Problems (60%). Posttest scores in all modules increased significantly (p < .001).
Breastfeeding Basics was used by a large number of nurses and nursing students. Gaps exist in nurses' breastfeeding knowledge. Knowledge improved in all areas based on comparison of pretest and posttest scores.
评估完成在线教育项目“母乳喂养基础”的护士、护生、助产士和执业护士的基线知识以及所获得的知识。
本研究报告了一项针对在线母乳喂养教育项目的匿名评估,该项目旨在促进基于证据的母乳喂养实践。
研究纳入了1999年4月至2011年12月31日期间在美国完成“母乳喂养基础”网站上至少一次预测试或后测试的3736名护士、728名执业护士/助产士和3106名护生。
分析基线分数,以确定护士的基线知识是否因选定的人口统计学变量(如年龄、性别、专业水平、个人或伴侣的母乳喂养经历,以及他们是否因工作或学校要求而必须完成该网站)而有所不同,并确定知识差距。比较所有模块以及预测试分数较低的特定问题的预测试和后测试分数,作为所获知识的一种衡量。
护生(71%)、男性(71%)、那些被要求参加该课程的人(75%)以及那些没有个人母乳喂养经历的人(72%)的预测试中位数分数较低。预测试中位数分数最低的模块是解剖学/生理学(67%)、母乳喂养婴儿的生长与发育(67%)、母乳喂养的夫妇(73%)以及有问题的足月儿(60%)。所有模块的后测试分数均显著提高(p < 0.001)。
大量护士和护生使用了“母乳喂养基础”。护士在母乳喂养知识方面存在差距。根据预测试和后测试分数的比较,所有领域的知识都有所提高。