Albertine K H, Cerasoli F, Tahamont M V, Ishihara Y, Flynn J T, Peters S P, Gee M H
Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Dec;67(6):2481-90. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.6.2481.
It is well established that activation of neutrophils within the pulmonary circulation produces acute lung injury in which adherence of neutrophils to endothelial cells is an obligatory step in the mechanism of injury. The effects of in vivo activation of neutrophils on the in vitro responses of these cells to stimulation have not been determined, although such information may be important in understanding how different etiological factors may interact to produce infection or acute respiratory failure. By using an assay to sequentially measure superoxide anion (O2-) release from adherent neutrophils stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), we measured the in vitro activation response of peripheral blood neutrophils isolated before and 24 h after infusion of zymosan-activated plasma (ZAP; or untreated plasma as a control), air bubbles, or PMA in awake, instrumented sheep. Each of the three inflammatory agents produced an increase in lung microvascular permeability characteristic of acute lung injury; control plasma did not. For the in vivo ZAP experiments, stimulated O2- release in vitro by using PMA was approximately 50% lower (P less than 0.05) for neutrophils isolated 24 h after the in vivo infusion (4.3 +/- 0.8 nmol/500,000 cells) than before (8.1 +/- 0.2 nmol/500,000 cells). For the air emboli or PMA in vivo experiments, there were no changes in neutrophil activation responses in vitro. Similarly, infusion of control plasma did not result in reduced neutrophil O2- release. These results show that alterations in the inflammatory potential of neutrophils may occur in vivo and that such alterations appear to be dependent on the mechanism and agent by which lung injury is produced.
众所周知,肺循环中嗜中性粒细胞的激活会导致急性肺损伤,其中嗜中性粒细胞与内皮细胞的黏附是损伤机制中的一个必要步骤。尽管此类信息对于理解不同病因如何相互作用导致感染或急性呼吸衰竭可能很重要,但嗜中性粒细胞在体内的激活对这些细胞体外刺激反应的影响尚未确定。通过使用一种测定方法来顺序测量用佛波酯肉豆蔻酸酯(PMA)刺激的黏附嗜中性粒细胞释放超氧阴离子(O2-),我们测量了在清醒、装有仪器的绵羊中,在注入酵母聚糖激活血浆(ZAP;或未处理血浆作为对照)、气泡或PMA之前和之后24小时分离的外周血嗜中性粒细胞的体外激活反应。三种炎症介质中的每一种都会导致急性肺损伤特有的肺微血管通透性增加;对照血浆则不会。对于体内ZAP实验,体内注入24小时后分离的嗜中性粒细胞,用PMA体外刺激的O2-释放量(4.3±0.8 nmol/500,000个细胞)比之前(8.1±0.2 nmol/500,000个细胞)降低了约50%(P<0.05)。对于体内空气栓塞或PMA实验,嗜中性粒细胞的体外激活反应没有变化。同样,注入对照血浆也不会导致嗜中性粒细胞O2-释放减少。这些结果表明,嗜中性粒细胞的炎症潜能在体内可能会发生改变,而且这种改变似乎取决于肺损伤产生的机制和介质。