儿童STEP计划有效性试验的服务使用结果：对模块化设计的进一步支持
Service Use Findings from the Child STEPs Effectiveness Trial: Additional Support for Modular Designs.
作者信息
Park Alayna L, Tsai Katherine H, Guan Karen, Reding Michael E J, Chorpita Bruce F, Weisz John R
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
出版信息
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Jan;43(1):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0625-1.
This study expands upon the Chorpita et al. (J Consult Clin Psychol 81:999-1009, 2013) findings by examining the impact of treatment protocol on youths' service utilization up to 2 years after starting an episode of: standard manualized treatment (Standard); modular treatment (Modular); or usual care (UC). Results showed that youths who received Modular accessed fewer service settings at their one-year follow-up relative to youths who received Standard or UC. Findings suggest that modular treatment may offer an advantage over standardized treatment manuals and UC in terms of sustained clinical benefits, and highlight the importance of treatment design considerations for service systems.
本研究扩展了乔皮塔等人（《咨询与临床心理学杂志》81:999 - 1009，2013年）的研究结果，通过考察治疗方案对青少年在开始一段治疗后的长达两年的服务利用情况的影响：标准手册化治疗（标准组）；模块化治疗（模块化组）；或常规护理（常规护理组）。结果显示，在一年随访时，接受模块化治疗的青少年相对于接受标准治疗或常规护理的青少年，进入的服务机构更少。研究结果表明，在持续的临床益处方面，模块化治疗可能比标准化治疗手册和常规护理具有优势，并突出了治疗设计考虑因素对服务系统的重要性。
Zotero 插件