Persaud Anurani D, Paterson Andrew M, Dillon Peter J, Winter Jennifer G, Palmer Michelle, Somers Keith M
Environmental and Resource Studies, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Dorset Environmental Science Centre, 1026 Bellwood Acres Road, Dorset, ON P0A 1E0, Canada.
J Environ Manage. 2015 Mar 15;151:343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Predictive models based on broad scale, spatial surveys typically identify nutrients and climate as the most important predictors of cyanobacteria abundance; however these models generally have low predictive power because at smaller geographic scales numerous other factors may be equally or more important. At the lake level, for example, the ability to forecast cyanobacteria dominance is of tremendous value to lake managers as they can use such models to communicate exposure risks associated with recreational and drinking water use, and possible exposure to algal toxins, in advance of bloom occurrence. We used detailed algal, limnological and meteorological data from two temperate lakes in south-central Ontario, Canada to determine the factors that are closely linked to cyanobacteria dominance, and to develop easy to use models to forecast cyanobacteria biovolume. For Brandy Lake (BL), the strongest and most parsimonious model for forecasting % cyanobacteria biovolume (% CB) included water column stability, hypolimnetic TP, and % cyanobacteria biovolume two weeks prior. For Three Mile Lake (TML), the best model for forecasting % CB included water column stability, hypolimnetic TP concentration, and 7-d mean wind speed. The models for forecasting % CB in BL and TML are fundamentally different in their lag periods (BL = lag 1 model and TML = lag 2 model) and in some predictor variables despite the close proximity of the study lakes. We speculate that three main factors (nutrient concentrations, water transparency and lake morphometry) may have contributed to differences in the models developed, and may account for variation observed in models derived from large spatial surveys. Our results illustrate that while forecast models can be developed to determine when cyanobacteria will dominate within two temperate lakes, the models require detailed, lake-specific calibration to be effective as risk-management tools.
基于大规模空间调查的预测模型通常将营养物质和气候确定为蓝藻丰度的最重要预测因子;然而,这些模型的预测能力一般较低,因为在较小的地理尺度上,许多其他因素可能同样重要或更为重要。例如,在湖泊层面,预测蓝藻优势的能力对湖泊管理者具有巨大价值,因为他们可以利用此类模型在水华发生之前传达与娱乐用水和饮用水使用相关的暴露风险,以及可能接触藻毒素的风险。我们使用了来自加拿大安大略省中南部两个温带湖泊的详细藻类、湖沼学和气象数据,以确定与蓝藻优势密切相关的因素,并开发易于使用的模型来预测蓝藻生物量。对于白兰地湖(BL),预测蓝藻生物量百分比(%CB)的最强且最简约的模型包括水柱稳定性、亚底层总磷以及两周前的蓝藻生物量百分比。对于三英里湖(TML),预测%CB的最佳模型包括水柱稳定性、亚底层总磷浓度和7天平均风速。尽管研究湖泊距离很近,但BL和TML预测%CB的模型在滞后时间(BL = 滞后1模型,TML = 滞后2模型)和一些预测变量方面存在根本差异。我们推测,三个主要因素(营养物质浓度、水体透明度和湖泊形态测量)可能导致了所开发模型的差异,并可能解释了从大规模空间调查得出的模型中观察到的变化。我们的结果表明,虽然可以开发预测模型来确定两个温带湖泊中蓝藻何时会占据主导地位,但这些模型需要进行详细且特定于湖泊的校准,才能作为有效的风险管理工具。