Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Service, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2014 Nov-Dec;25(6):299-304. doi: 10.1155/2014/983724.
Invasive fungal infections are associated with morbidity and mortality in neutropenia secondary to hematological malignancies. Empirical antifungal agents are used to reduce their consequences. Caspofungin is the only echinocandin approved for this indication. Micafungin was compared with caspofungin for the treatment of patients with hematological malignancies and prolonged neutropenia.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who had hematological malignancies with profound neutropenia for a minimum of 10 days, and received empirical micafungin or caspofungin for a minimum of five days, between April 2005 and November 2009. Successful outcome was based on a composite end point: survival for a minimum of seven days following antifungal cessation, successful treatment of baseline fungal infection, absence of adverse events and absence of breakthrough fungal infection. Fungal infections were defined according to revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC-MSG) criteria, with modification of the diagnostic imaging criteria.
Micafungin had similar overall success to caspofungin (60.4% [29 of 48] versus 57.3% [47 of 82], respectively; P=0.729). Survival was higher in the micafungin group compared with the caspofungin group (100% [48 of 48] versus 89% [73 of 82]; P=0.02). No baseline invasive fungal infections were identified in the micafungin group, compared with three proven infections treated successfully with caspofungin (3.7%; P=0.18). Three proven breakthrough infections were observed in the micafungin group (three of 48 [27.3%]) compared with none in the caspofungin group (zero of 82; P=0.02).
Micafungin has similar efficacy to caspofungin as empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Verification of these results in a prospective trial is warranted.
侵袭性真菌感染与血液恶性肿瘤继发中性粒细胞减少症的发病率和死亡率相关。经验性抗真菌药物可用于降低其后果。卡泊芬净是唯一批准用于该适应证的棘白菌素类药物。米卡芬净与卡泊芬净比较,用于治疗血液恶性肿瘤和中性粒细胞减少症持续时间较长的患者。
回顾性队列研究纳入 2005 年 4 月至 2009 年 11 月期间至少接受 10 天经验性米卡芬净或卡泊芬净治疗、中性粒细胞减少症至少 10 天的血液恶性肿瘤患者。成功的结果基于一个综合终点:抗真菌治疗停止后至少 7 天存活、基线真菌感染得到成功治疗、无不良事件和无突破性真菌感染。真菌感染根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/侵袭性真菌感染合作组和美国国立变态反应与传染病研究所真菌病研究组(EORTC-MSG)标准的侵袭性真菌病修订定义以及诊断影像学标准进行定义,并进行了修改。
米卡芬净的总体成功率与卡泊芬净相似(分别为 60.4%[48 例中的 29 例]和 57.3%[82 例中的 47 例];P=0.729)。米卡芬净组的存活率高于卡泊芬净组(100%[48 例中的 48 例]和 89%[82 例中的 73 例];P=0.02)。米卡芬净组未发现基线侵袭性真菌感染,而卡泊芬净组有 3 例确诊的真菌感染得到成功治疗(3.7%;P=0.18)。米卡芬净组观察到 3 例确诊的突破性感染(48 例中的 3 例[27.3%]),而卡泊芬净组无此类感染(82 例中的 0 例;P=0.02)。
米卡芬净作为经验性抗真菌治疗药物,在血液恶性肿瘤发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的疗效与卡泊芬净相似。需要进行前瞻性试验来验证这些结果。