Lerman Caryn, Schnoll Robert A, Hawk Larry W, Cinciripini Paul, George Tony P, Wileyto E Paul, Swan Gary E, Benowitz Neal L, Heitjan Daniel F, Tyndale Rachel F
Department of Psychiatry, Annenberg School for Communication, and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Feb;3(2):131-138. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70294-2. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
Substantial variability exists in therapeutic response and adverse effects with pharmacotherapies for tobacco dependence. Biomarkers to optimise treatment choice for individual smokers might improve treatment outcomes. We tested whether a genetically informed biomarker of nicotine clearance, the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR; 3'-hydroxycotinine:cotinine), predicts response to nicotine patch or varenicline for smoking cessation.
We undertook NMR-stratified multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial from Nov 16, 2010, to Sept 12, 2014, at four sites. Smokers seeking treatment were randomly assigned by baseline NMR status and study site, in blocks of 12 patients (1:1:1 ratio), to 11 weeks of placebo (placebo pill plus placebo patch), nicotine patch (active patch plus placebo pill), or varenicline (active pill plus placebo patch), plus behavioural counselling. Participants and investigators were masked to group allocation and NMR status. An intention-to-treat analysis was done. Participants were followed up for 12 months after the target quit date. The primary endpoint was biochemically verified 7 day point prevalence abstinence at the end of treatment to estimate the pharmacological effect of treatment by NMR. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01314001.
1246 participants (662 slow metabolisers of nicotine, 584 normal metabolisers of nicotine) were enrolled and randomly assigned to the three interventions (408 placebo, 418 nicotine patch, 420 varenicline). At end of treatment, varenicline was more efficacious than nicotine patch in normal metabolisers (OR 2·17, 95% CI 1·38-3·42; p=0·001), but not in slow metabolisers (OR 1·13, 0·74-1·71; p=0·56). In the longitudinal model including all timepoints, the NMR-by-treatment interaction was significant (ratio of odds ratios [ORR] 1·96, 95% CI 1·11-3·46; p=0·02). An NMR-by-treatment interaction showed that slow (vs normal) metabolisers reported greater overall side-effect severity with varenicline versus placebo (β=-1·06, 95% CI -2·08 to -0·03; p=0·044).
Treating normal metabolisers with varenicline and slow metabolisers with nicotine patch could optimise quit rates while minimising side-effects.
National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Abramson Cancer Center, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation, and Pennsylvania Department of Health.
烟草依赖药物治疗的疗效和不良反应存在很大差异。用于优化个体吸烟者治疗选择的生物标志物可能会改善治疗效果。我们测试了尼古丁清除的基因信息生物标志物——尼古丁代谢物比率(NMR;3'-羟基可替宁:可替宁)是否能预测尼古丁贴片或伐尼克兰戒烟治疗的反应。
我们于2010年11月16日至2014年9月12日在四个地点进行了一项按NMR分层的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。寻求治疗的吸烟者按基线NMR状态和研究地点,以12名患者为一组(1:1:1比例)随机分配,接受11周的安慰剂(安慰剂药丸加安慰剂贴片)、尼古丁贴片(活性贴片加安慰剂药丸)或伐尼克兰(活性药丸加安慰剂贴片)治疗,并接受行为咨询。参与者和研究人员对分组分配和NMR状态不知情。进行意向性分析。在目标戒烟日期后对参与者进行12个月的随访。主要终点是治疗结束时经生化验证的7天点患病率戒烟率,以通过NMR评估治疗的药理作用。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT01314001。
共纳入1246名参与者(662名尼古丁慢代谢者,584名尼古丁正常代谢者),并随机分配至三种干预措施组(408名接受安慰剂,418名接受尼古丁贴片,420名接受伐尼克兰)。治疗结束时,伐尼克兰在正常代谢者中的疗效优于尼古丁贴片(比值比[OR]2·17,95%置信区间1·38 - 3·42;p = 0·001),但在慢代谢者中并非如此(OR 1·13,0·74 - 1·71;p = 0·56)。在包括所有时间点的纵向模型中,NMR与治疗的交互作用显著(优势比比值[ORR]1·96,95%置信区间1·11 - 3·46;p = 0·02)。NMR与治疗的交互作用表明,与安慰剂相比,慢代谢者(与正常代谢者相比)使用伐尼克兰时报告的总体副作用严重程度更高(β = -1·06,95%置信区间 -2·08至 -0·03;p = 0·044)。
用伐尼克兰治疗正常代谢者,用尼古丁贴片治疗慢代谢者可优化戒烟率,同时将副作用降至最低。
美国国立卫生研究院、加拿大卫生研究院、艾布拉姆森癌症中心成瘾与精神健康基金会以及宾夕法尼亚州卫生部。