Church Charles C, Labuda Cecille, Nightingale Kathryn
National Center for Physical Acoustics and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
National Center for Physical Acoustics and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Feb;41(2):472-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.012.
The mechanical index (MI) attempts to quantify the likelihood that exposure to diagnostic ultrasound will produce an adverse biological effect by a non-thermal mechanism. The current formulation of the MI implicitly assumes that the acoustic field is generated using the short pulse durations appropriate to B-mode imaging. However, acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging employs high-intensity pulses up to several hundred acoustic periods long. The effect of increased pulse durations on the thresholds for inertial cavitation was studied computationally in water, urine, blood, cardiac and skeletal muscle, brain, kidney, liver and skin. The results indicate that, although the effect of pulse duration on cavitation thresholds in the three liquids can be considerable, reducing them by, for example, 6%-24% at 1 MHz, the effect on tissue is minor. More importantly, the frequency dependence of the MI appears to be unnecessarily conservative; that is, the magnitude of the exponent on frequency could be increased to 0.75. Comparison of these theoretical results with experimental measurements suggests that some tissues do not contain the pre-existing, optimally sized bubbles assumed for the MI. This means that in these tissues, the MI is not necessarily a strong predictor of the probability of an adverse biological effect.
机械指数(MI)试图量化因非热机制而暴露于诊断超声下产生不良生物效应的可能性。当前MI的公式隐含地假设声场是使用适合B模式成像的短脉冲持续时间产生的。然而,声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)成像采用长达数百个声周期的高强度脉冲。在水、尿液、血液、心肌和骨骼肌、脑、肾、肝和皮肤中通过计算研究了脉冲持续时间增加对惯性空化阈值的影响。结果表明,尽管脉冲持续时间对三种液体中空化阈值的影响可能相当大,例如在1 MHz时可将其降低6%-24%,但对组织的影响较小。更重要的是,MI的频率依赖性似乎过于保守;也就是说,频率指数的大小可以增加到0.75。将这些理论结果与实验测量结果进行比较表明,一些组织并不包含MI所假设的预先存在的、最佳大小的气泡。这意味着在这些组织中,MI不一定是不良生物效应发生概率的有力预测指标。