• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于将连续性医疗文件纳入长期急性后护理(LTPAC)患者评估的州健康信息交换调查。

Survey of state health information exchanges regarding inclusion of Continuity of Care Documents for long-term post-acute care (LTPAC) patient assessment.

作者信息

Hassol Andrea, Goodman Laura, Younkin Jim, Honicker Mary, Chaundy Kimberly, Walker James M

机构信息

Andrea Hassol, MSPH, is a principal associate at Abt Associates, Inc., in Cambridge, MA.

Laura Goodman was an associate analyst at Abt Associates, Inc., in Cambridge, MA.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014 Oct 1;11(Fall):1g. eCollection 2014.

PMID:25593573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4272441/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to measure awareness and interest among state health information exchanges (HIEs) in a tool that translates long-term post-acute care (LTPAC) patient assessment information to a Continuity of Care Document (CCD) format for sharing; whether any state HIEs currently integrate patient information from LTPAC providers; and the anticipated benefits and barriers to using such a tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of an online survey of state HIEs.

RESULTS

Responses were received from representatives of 29 of the 51 HIEs (57 percent). Eleven of the 29 respondents (38 percent) were aware of the LTPAC-to-CCD translation tool, and 24 (83 percent of respondents) were interested in it or felt LTPAC providers in their state would be interested. Twenty-one of the 24 interested respondents (88 percent) indicated a desire for more information about this technology.

DISCUSSION

Skilled nursing facilities and home health agencies receive no incentives for adoption of electronic health record systems and are not commonly included in HIEs. These organizations do, however collect extensive structured data about their patients (Minimum Data Set for nursing facilities, Outcome and Assessment Information Set for home health agencies) and transmit the data electronically to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). A tool is now available that will intercept the transmissions to CMS, transform content extracted from patient assessments into CCDs, and send the CCDs to a designated HIE.

CONCLUSION

Responding HIEs reported almost no experience exchanging patient assessment information from LTPAC providers. Anticipated benefits include safer care transitions; anticipated barriers include information technology constraints in LTPAC settings.

摘要

目标

本研究旨在衡量州级健康信息交换机构(HIEs)对一种工具的认知度和兴趣,该工具可将长期急性后护理(LTPAC)患者评估信息转换为连续性护理文档(CCD)格式以便共享;了解目前是否有州级HIEs整合了来自LTPAC提供者的患者信息;以及使用此类工具的预期益处和障碍。

材料与方法

该研究包括对州级HIEs的在线调查。

结果

收到了51个HIEs中29个(57%)的代表的回复。29名受访者中有11名(38%)知晓LTPAC到CCD的转换工具,24名(占受访者的83%)对此感兴趣或认为他们所在州的LTPAC提供者会感兴趣。24名感兴趣的受访者中有21名(88%)表示希望获得更多关于这项技术的信息。

讨论

熟练护理机构和家庭健康机构在采用电子健康记录系统方面没有受到激励,并且通常不被纳入HIEs。然而,这些组织确实收集了有关其患者的大量结构化数据(护理机构的最低数据集、家庭健康机构的结果和评估信息集),并以电子方式将数据传输给医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)。现在有一种工具可以拦截发往CMS的传输数据,将从患者评估中提取的内容转换为CCD,并将CCD发送到指定的HIE。

结论

做出回应的HIEs报告称,在交换来自LTPAC提供者的患者评估信息方面几乎没有经验。预期益处包括更安全的护理过渡;预期障碍包括LTPAC环境中的信息技术限制。

相似文献

1
Survey of state health information exchanges regarding inclusion of Continuity of Care Documents for long-term post-acute care (LTPAC) patient assessment.关于将连续性医疗文件纳入长期急性后护理(LTPAC)患者评估的州健康信息交换调查。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014 Oct 1;11(Fall):1g. eCollection 2014.
2
Differing Strategies to Meet Information-Sharing Needs: Publicly Supported Community Health Information Exchanges Versus Health Systems' Enterprise Health Information Exchanges.满足信息共享需求的不同策略:公共支持的社区健康信息交换与卫生系统的企业健康信息交换
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):77-108. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12180.
3
Transitions From Acute Care to Long-Term Care: Evaluation of the Continued Access Model.从急性护理到长期护理的过渡:持续接入模式的评估。
J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Apr;38(4):510-529. doi: 10.1177/0733464817723565. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
4
Characteristics of patient portals developed in the context of health information exchanges: early policy effects of incentives in the meaningful use program in the United States.在健康信息交换背景下开发的患者门户的特征:美国有意义使用计划中激励措施的早期政策效果
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 21;16(11):e258. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3698.
5
Investing in Post-Acute Care Transitions: Electronic Information Exchange Between Hospitals and Long-Term Care Facilities.投资于急性后期护理过渡:医院与长期护理机构之间的电子信息交换。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
The Veteran-Initiated Electronic Care Coordination: A Multisite Initiative to Promote and Evaluate Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.退伍军人发起的电子护理协调:一项促进和评估消费者介导的健康信息交换的多地点倡议。
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Apr;23(4):264-272. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0078. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
7
Health Information Exchange Readiness for Demonstrating Return on Investment and Quality of Care.用于证明投资回报率和医疗质量的健康信息交换准备情况。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Nov 1;12(Fall):1d. eCollection 2015.
8
Electronic Health Records in Long-Term Care: Staff Perspectives.长期护理中的电子健康记录:工作人员观点
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Oct;36(10):1175-1196. doi: 10.1177/0733464815608493. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Health information exchange between jails and their communities: a bridge that is needed under healthcare reform.监狱与其所在社区之间的健康信息交流:医疗改革背景下一座亟待搭建的桥梁。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2014 Jan 1;11(Winter):1b. eCollection 2014.
10
Health information exchanges--Unfulfilled promise as a data source for clinical research.健康信息交换——作为临床研究数据源的承诺未兑现。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.005. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Health Information Exchange to Augment Patient Handoff in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review.利用健康信息交换增强长期护理中的患者交接:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):752-771. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1670651. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption and use of electronic health records and mobile technology by home health and hospice care agencies.家庭健康与临终关怀机构对电子健康记录和移动技术的采用与使用。
Natl Health Stat Report. 2013 May 20(66):1-11.
2
Community-based health information technology alliances: potential predictors of early sustainability.社区健康信息技术联盟:早期可持续性的潜在预测因素。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):290-5.
3
An internet-based communication network for information transfer during patient transitions from skilled nursing facility to the emergency department.一种基于互联网的通信网络,用于在患者从熟练护理机构转移到急诊科期间进行信息传递。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1148-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02864.x. Epub 2010 May 7.
4
Prevalence of information gaps for seniors transferred from nursing homes to the emergency department.养老院转至急诊科老年人信息缺口的发生率。
CJEM. 2009 Sep;11(5):462-71. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011660.
5
Elder care transfer forms.
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):160-1. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.001.
6
An extended care facility-to-emergency department transfer form improves communication.一份从长期护理机构到急诊科的转交接表格有助于改善沟通。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(2):114-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.10.013.
7
Advance directives in skilled nursing facility residents transferred to emergency departments.转至急诊科的熟练护理机构居民的预先医疗指示
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1158-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01133.x.
8
Communicating advance directives from long-term care facilities to emergency departments.将长期护理机构的预先医疗指示传达给急诊科。
J Emerg Med. 2001 Jul;21(1):83-9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00344-4.
9
The interface between nursing homes and emergency departments: a community effort to improve transfer of information.养老院与急诊科之间的衔接:一项旨在改善信息传递的社区工作。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;5(11):1123-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02677.x.