Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ann Thorac Med. 2015 Jan-Mar;10(1):44-9. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.146872.
Inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) has been shown to correlate with both clinical and invasive assessment of intravascular volume status, but has important limitations such as the requirement for advanced sonographic skills, the degree of difficulty in obtaining those skills, and often challenging visualization of the IVC in the postoperative patient. The current study aims to explore the potential for using femoral (FV) or internal jugular (IJV) vein collapsibility as alternative sonographic options in the absence of adequate IVC visualization.
A prospective, observational study comparing IVC-CI and Fem- and/or IJV-CI was performed in two intensive care units (ICU) between January 2012 and April 2014. Concurrent M-mode measurements of IVC-CI and FV- and/or IJV-CI were collected during each sonographic session. Measurements of IVC were obtained using standard technique. IJV-CI and FV-CI were measured using high-frequency, linear array ultrasound probe placed in the corresponding anatomic areas. Paired data were analyzed using coefficient of correlation/determination and Bland-Altman determination of measurement bias.
We performed paired ultrasound examination of IVC-IJV (n = 39) and IVC-FV (n = 22), in 40 patients (mean age 54.1; 40% women). Both FV-CI and IJV-CI scans took less time to complete than IVC-CI scans (both, P < 0.02). Correlations between IVC-CI/FV-CI (R(2) = 0.41) and IVC-CI/IJV-CI (R(2) = 0.38) were weak. There was a mean -3.5% measurement bias between IVC-CI and IJV-CI, with trend toward overestimation for IJV-CI with increasing collapsibility. In contrast, FV-CI underestimated collapsibility by approximately 3.8% across the measured collapsibility range.
Despite small measurement biases, correlations between IVC-CI and FV-/IJV-CI are weak. These results indicate that IJ-CI and FV-CI should not be used as a primary intravascular volume assessment tool for clinical decision support in the ICU. The authors propose that IJV-CI and FV-CI be reserved for clinical scenarios where sonographic acquisition of both IVC-CI or subclavian collapsibility are not feasible, especially when trended over time. Sonographers should be aware that IJV-CI tends to overestimate collapsibility when compared to IVC-CI, and FV-CI tends to underestimates collapsibility relative to IVC-CI.
下腔静脉塌陷指数(IVC-CI)已被证明与血管内容量状态的临床和侵入性评估相关,但存在重要的局限性,例如需要先进的超声技能、获得这些技能的难度程度,以及术后患者中 IVC 的可视化通常具有挑战性。本研究旨在探索在无法充分可视化 IVC 的情况下,使用股静脉(FV)或颈内静脉(IJV)静脉塌陷作为替代超声选择的潜力。
2012 年 1 月至 2014 年 4 月,在两个重症监护病房(ICU)进行了一项前瞻性、观察性研究,比较了 IVC-CI 和 Fem-和/或 IJV-CI。在每次超声检查期间,同时采集 IVC-CI 和 FV-和/或 IJV-CI 的 M 模式测量值。使用标准技术获得 IVC 测量值。使用高频线性阵列超声探头在相应的解剖区域测量 IJV-CI 和 FV-CI。使用相关系数/确定系数和 Bland-Altman 确定测量偏差对配对数据进行分析。
我们对 40 名患者(平均年龄 54.1 岁;40%为女性)的 IVC-IJV(n = 39)和 IVC-FV(n = 22)进行了配对超声检查。与 IVC-CI 扫描相比,FV-CI 和 IJV-CI 扫描完成时间更短(均 P < 0.02)。IVC-CI/FV-CI(R(2) = 0.41)和 IVC-CI/IJV-CI(R(2) = 0.38)之间的相关性较弱。IVC-CI 和 IJV-CI 之间存在平均 3.5%的测量偏差,随着可塌陷性的增加,IJV-CI 存在高估趋势。相比之下,FV-CI 在整个可塌陷性范围内平均低估了约 3.8%的可塌陷性。
尽管存在较小的测量偏差,但 IVC-CI 和 FV-/IJV-CI 之间的相关性较弱。这些结果表明,IJ-CI 和 FV-CI 不应作为 ICU 中临床决策支持的主要血管内容量评估工具。作者建议,保留 IJV-CI 和 FV-CI 用于无法获取 IVC-CI 或锁骨下可塌陷性的临床情况,特别是当随时间推移时。超声医师应注意到,与 IVC-CI 相比,IJV-CI 倾向于高估可塌陷性,而与 IVC-CI 相比,FV-CI 倾向于低估可塌陷性。