• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将消费者混淆概念应用于医疗保健:患者混淆模型的开发与验证。

Applying the concept of consumer confusion to healthcare: development and validation of a patient confusion model.

作者信息

Gebele Christoph, Tscheulin Dieter K, Lindenmeier Jörg, Drevs Florian, Seemann Ann-Kathrin

机构信息

Department of Business Administration II, Marketing and Health Care Management, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Business Administration VI, Public and Non-Profit Management - Corporate Governance and Ethics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

出版信息

Health Serv Manage Res. 2014 Feb-Jun;27(1-2):10-21. doi: 10.1177/0951484814546959. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1177/0951484814546959
PMID:25595013
Abstract

As patient autonomy and consumer sovereignty increase, information provision is considered essential to decrease information asymmetries between healthcare service providers and patients. However, greater availability of third party information sources can have negative side effects. Patients can be confused by the nature, as well as the amount, of quality information when making choices among competing health care providers. Therefore, the present study explores how information may cause patient confusion and affect the behavioral intention to choose a health care provider. Based on a quota sample of German citizens (n = 198), the present study validates a model of patient confusion in the context of hospital choice. The study results reveal that perceived information overload, perceived similarity, and perceived ambiguity of health information impact the affective and cognitive components of patient confusion. Confused patients have a stronger inclination to hastily narrow down their set of possible decision alternatives. Finally, an empirical analysis reveals that the affective and cognitive components of patient confusion mediate perceived information overload, perceived similarity, and perceived ambiguity of information.

摘要

随着患者自主权和消费者主权的增加,提供信息被认为对于减少医疗服务提供者与患者之间的信息不对称至关重要。然而,第三方信息来源的更多可得性可能会产生负面影响。患者在相互竞争的医疗服务提供者之间进行选择时,可能会被高质量信息的性质和数量所迷惑。因此,本研究探讨信息如何可能导致患者困惑并影响选择医疗服务提供者的行为意图。基于德国公民的配额样本(n = 198),本研究在医院选择的背景下验证了一个患者困惑模型。研究结果表明,感知到的信息过载、感知到的相似性以及健康信息的感知模糊性会影响患者困惑的情感和认知成分。感到困惑的患者更倾向于匆忙缩小其可能的决策选项范围。最后,实证分析表明,患者困惑的情感和认知成分在信息过载、感知到的相似性和信息的感知模糊性之间起中介作用。

相似文献

1
Applying the concept of consumer confusion to healthcare: development and validation of a patient confusion model.将消费者混淆概念应用于医疗保健:患者混淆模型的开发与验证。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2014 Feb-Jun;27(1-2):10-21. doi: 10.1177/0951484814546959. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
2
Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment.调查消费者和非正式护理人员对消费者导向型护理的看法和偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep;140:81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
Selecting a provider: what factors influence patients' decision making?选择医疗机构:哪些因素影响患者的决策?
J Healthc Manag. 2011 Mar-Apr;56(2):99-114; discussion 114-5.
4
Opportunities and limitations of patient choice: the case of the Russian Federation.患者选择的机遇与局限:以俄罗斯联邦为例
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Jan;29(1):106-14. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs139. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
5
How patients choose hospitals: using the stereotypic content model to model trustworthiness, warmth and competence.
Health Serv Manage Res. 2013 Aug;26(2-3):95-101. doi: 10.1177/0951484813513246.
6
User choice in European health systems: towards a systematic framework for analysis.用户在欧洲卫生系统中的选择:迈向分析的系统框架。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Jan;5(Pt 1):13-30. doi: 10.1017/S1744133109990132.
7
[Publication of healthcare quality data to citizens--status and perspectives].[向公民公开医疗质量数据——现状与展望]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2009 May 11;171(20):1670-4.
8
Consumer response to patient experience measures in complex information environments.消费者对复杂信息环境下患者体验测量的反应。
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl:S56-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826c84e1.
9
Seek and ye shall find: consumer search for objective health care cost and quality information.寻则得之:消费者对客观医疗保健成本和质量信息的搜索。
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):433-40. doi: 10.1177/1062860611400898. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
10
Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.精神卫生保健中的共同决策和跨专业合作:探索障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2013 Sep;27(5):373-9. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.785503. Epub 2013 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The paradox of convenience: how information overload in mHealth apps leads to medical service overuse.便利的悖论:移动健康应用中的信息过载如何导致医疗服务过度使用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;12:1408998. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408998. eCollection 2024.
2
How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians.患者叙述的接触如何影响初级保健临床医生的刻板选择。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295243. eCollection 2023.
3
Giving more detailed information about health insurance encourages consumers to choose compromise options.
提供有关健康保险的更详细信息会鼓励消费者选择折中的方案。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 16;14:1257031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257031. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving Patients' Choice of Clinician by Including Roll-up Measures in Public Healthcare Quality Reports: an Online Experiment.在公共医疗质量报告中纳入累积措施以改善患者对临床医生的选择:一项在线实验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):243-249. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4725-y. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
5
Dr Google Is Here to Stay but Health Care Professionals Are Still Valued: An Analysis of Health Care Consumers' Internet Navigation Support Preferences.“谷歌医生”将持续存在,但医疗保健专业人员仍受重视:对医疗保健消费者互联网导航支持偏好的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 14;19(6):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7489.