Suppr超能文献

基层医疗医生及其患者对慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度评估与肺功能测定的临床研究。

A clinical study of COPD severity assessment by primary care physicians and their patients compared with spirometry.

作者信息

Mapel Douglas W, Dalal Anand A, Johnson Phaedra, Becker Laura, Hunter Alyssa Goolsby

机构信息

Lovelace Clinic Foundation, Albuquerque, NM.

GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2015 Jun;128(6):629-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Primary care physicians often do not use spirometry to confirm the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This project was designed to see how well physicians' impressions about their patients' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity correlate with the severity of airflow obstruction measured by spirometry and to assess whether spirometry results subsequently changed the physicians' opinions about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and treatment.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study conducted in 83 primary care clinics from across the United States. A total of 899 patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease completed a questionnaire and spirometry testing. Physicians completed a questionnaire and case report forms. Concordance among physician ratings, patient ratings, and spirometry results was evaluated.

RESULTS

Physicians' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity ratings before spirometry were accurate for only 30% of patients with evaluable spirometry results, and disease severity in 41% of patients was underestimated. Physicians also underestimated severity compared with patients' self-assessment among 42% of those with evaluable results. After spirometry, physicians changed their opinions on the severity for 30% of patients and recommended treatment changes for 37%. Only 75% of patients performed at least 1 high-quality spirometry test; however, the physicians' opinions and treatment decisions were similar regardless of suboptimal test results.

CONCLUSIONS

Without performing spirometry, physicians are likely to underestimate their patients' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity or inadequately characterize their patients' lung disease. Spirometry changed the physicians' clinical impressions and treatments for approximately one third of these patients; thus, spirometry is a valuable tool for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management in primary care.

摘要

目的

基层医疗医生常常不使用肺量计来确诊慢性阻塞性肺疾病。本项目旨在观察医生对其患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度的判断与通过肺量计测量的气流阻塞严重程度之间的关联程度,并评估肺量计检测结果随后是否改变了医生对慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度及治疗的看法。

方法

我们在美国各地的83家基层医疗诊所开展了一项多中心、横断面观察性研究。共有899例临床诊断为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患者完成了问卷调查及肺量计检测。医生完成了问卷调查及病例报告表。对医生评级、患者评级及肺量计检测结果之间的一致性进行了评估。

结果

在有可评估肺量计检测结果的患者中,仅30%的患者在进行肺量计检测前医生对其慢性阻塞性肺疾病严重程度的评级是准确的,41%的患者疾病严重程度被低估。在有可评估结果的患者中,与患者自我评估相比,42%的患者医生也低估了严重程度。进行肺量计检测后,30%的患者医生改变了对其严重程度的看法,37%的患者医生建议更改治疗方案。仅75%的患者至少进行了1次高质量的肺量计检测;然而,无论检测结果是否不理想,医生的看法及治疗决策都相似。

结论

不进行肺量计检测,医生很可能低估其患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病的严重程度或对患者的肺部疾病特征描述不充分。肺量计改变了约三分之一此类患者医生的临床印象及治疗方案;因此,肺量计是基层医疗中管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病的一项有价值的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验