Quinn Michael, Turula Holly, Tandon Mayank, Deslouches Berthony, Moghbeli Toktam, Snyder Christopher M
Department of Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
J Immunol. 2015 Feb 15;194(4):1726-1736. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402757. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
Reconstitution of CMV-specific immunity after transplant remains a primary clinical objective to prevent CMV disease, and adoptive immunotherapy of CMV-specific T cells can be an effective therapeutic approach. Because of viral persistence, most CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells become terminally differentiated effector phenotype CD8(+) T cells (TEFF). A minor subset retains a memory-like phenotype (memory phenotype CD8(+) T cells [TM]), but it is unknown whether these cells retain memory function or persist over time. Interestingly, recent studies suggest that CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells with different phenotypes have different abilities to reconstitute sustained immunity after transfer. The immunology of human CMV infections is reflected in the murine CMV (MCMV) model. We found that human CMV- and MCMV-specific T cells displayed shared genetic programs, validating the MCMV model for studies of CMV-specific T cells in vivo. The MCMV-specific TM population was stable over time and retained a proliferative capacity that was vastly superior to TEFF. Strikingly, after transfer, TM established sustained and diverse T cell populations even after multiple challenges. Although both TEFF and TM could protect Rag(-/-) mice, only TM persisted after transfer into immune replete, latently infected recipients and responded if recipient immunity was lost. Interestingly, transferred TM did not expand until recipient immunity was lost, supporting that competition limits the Ag stimulation of TM. Ultimately, these data show that CMV-specific TM retain memory function during MCMV infection and can re-establish CMV immunity when necessary. Thus, TM may be a critical component for consistent, long-term adoptive immunotherapy success.
移植后重建巨细胞病毒特异性免疫仍然是预防巨细胞病毒疾病的主要临床目标,而巨细胞病毒特异性T细胞的过继性免疫疗法可能是一种有效的治疗方法。由于病毒持续存在,大多数巨细胞病毒特异性CD8(+) T细胞会分化为终末分化效应表型CD8(+) T细胞(TEFF)。一小部分细胞保留类似记忆的表型(记忆表型CD8(+) T细胞[TM]),但尚不清楚这些细胞是否保留记忆功能或随时间持续存在。有趣的是,最近的研究表明,具有不同表型的巨细胞病毒特异性CD8(+) T细胞在转移后重建持续免疫的能力不同。人类巨细胞病毒感染的免疫学在鼠巨细胞病毒(MCMV)模型中得到体现。我们发现人类巨细胞病毒和MCMV特异性T细胞表现出共同的基因程序,验证了MCMV模型在体内研究巨细胞病毒特异性T细胞的有效性。MCMV特异性TM群体随时间稳定,并保留了远优于TEFF的增殖能力。引人注目的是,转移后,即使在多次攻击后,TM也能建立持续且多样的T细胞群体。虽然TEFF和TM都能保护Rag(-/-)小鼠,但只有TM在转移到免疫功能健全、潜伏感染的受体后持续存在,并且在受体免疫丧失时做出反应。有趣的是,转移的TM直到受体免疫丧失才会扩增,这支持竞争限制了TM的抗原刺激。最终,这些数据表明,在MCMV感染期间,巨细胞病毒特异性TM保留记忆功能,并在必要时可以重新建立巨细胞病毒免疫。因此,TM可能是持续、长期过继性免疫治疗成功的关键组成部分。