Guo Wan-Liang, Wang Jian, Zhu Li-Yuan, Hao Chuang-Li
Radiology Department, the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
General Surgery Department, the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 16;5(1):e006766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006766.
To analyse the clinical features, inflammatory markers and radiographs of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) cases with lobe or multi foci infiltration; with a special focus on factors which allow the differential diagnosis of viral and mycoplasma pneumonia.
Retrospective chart review of CAP cases in a large university teaching hospital.
126 paediatric CAP cases, with lobe or multi foci infiltration, presenting between May 2012 and April 2013. Demographic data, clinical presentation on admission or referral, laboratory tests, prior history, and radiography were collected for each case if available.
We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine the significant factors which allow the differential diagnosis of viral and mycoplasma CAP with lobe or multi foci infiltration.
There were 71 (56%) male and 55 (44%) female CAP cases with lobar or multi foci infiltration. 70 pneumonia cases were caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and 18 by viruses. Univariate analysis of the mycoplasma and viral causes of the CAP revealed that increased respiratory rate, wheeze, male gender and lymphocyte percentage were the factors associated with the differentiation of mycoplasma and viral aetiologies of pneumonia (p<0.05). A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent factors which allow the differential diagnosis of viral and mycoplasma pneumonia. Increased respiratory rate, wheeze, and lymphocyte percentage were reliable independent factors which allow the differential diagnosis of viral and mycoplasma CAP with lobar or multi foci infiltration.
Whether the CAP with lobar or multi foci infiltration was caused by mycoplasma species or viruses could not be inferred from the radiological patterns. Wheeze, lymphocyte percentage and respiratory rate were independent factors which allowed the differential diagnosis of viral and mycoplasma CAP with lobar or multi foci infiltration.
分析社区获得性肺炎(CAP)伴有肺叶或多灶性浸润病例的临床特征、炎症标志物及影像学表现;特别关注有助于鉴别病毒性肺炎和支原体肺炎的因素。
对一家大型大学教学医院的CAP病例进行回顾性病历审查。
2012年5月至2013年4月期间出现肺叶或多灶性浸润的126例儿童CAP病例。若数据可得,收集每例病例的人口统计学数据、入院或转诊时的临床表现、实验室检查、既往史及影像学检查结果。
我们采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析来确定有助于鉴别伴有肺叶或多灶性浸润的病毒性和支原体性CAP的显著因素。
71例(56%)男性和55例(44%)女性CAP病例伴有肺叶或多灶性浸润。70例肺炎由肺炎支原体引起,18例由病毒引起。对CAP的支原体和病毒病因进行单因素分析发现,呼吸频率增加、喘息、男性及淋巴细胞百分比是与肺炎支原体和病毒病因鉴别相关的因素(p<0.05)。进行逐步逻辑回归分析以评估有助于鉴别病毒性肺炎和支原体肺炎的独立因素。呼吸频率增加、喘息及淋巴细胞百分比是有助于鉴别伴有肺叶或多灶性浸润的病毒性和支原体性CAP的可靠独立因素。
伴有肺叶或多灶性浸润的CAP是由支原体还是病毒引起,无法从影像学表现推断。喘息、淋巴细胞百分比及呼吸频率是有助于鉴别伴有肺叶或多灶性浸润的病毒性和支原体性CAP的独立因素。