Nilsson Cecilia, Valachis Antonis
Center for Clinical Research, Västmanlands County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden.
Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Jan;114(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
The purpose of this meta-analysis is to summarize the current evidence on the role of boost and the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) after surgery and grade the quality of evidence.
A comprehensive systematic electronic search through MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library as well as through the major international congresses' proceedings was conducted. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated the efficacy of hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy or the efficacy of boost vs. no boost in patients with DCIS. The outcome of interest was the number of local recurrences. Pooled estimates were calculated by using standard meta-analytic procedures.
Thirteen trials were considered eligible and were further analyzed. No difference in the risk of local recurrence was observed between the patients that received boost vs. no boost in the general cohort (12 studies, 6943 patients; Odds Ratio (OR): 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-1.08, very low level of evidence). However, we found a reduced risk for local recurrence when boost was administered in patients with positive margins compared to no boost (6 studies, 811 patients; OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.87, very low level of evidence). No difference in local recurrence rate between patients who received hypofractionated versus standard radiotherapy was observed (4 studies, 2534 patients; OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.58-1.03, low level of evidence).
Hypofractionated radiotherapy seems to be a safe option in patients with DCIS after breast-conserving surgery while the addition of boost reduces the risk for local recurrence in the presence of positive margins. However, the level of evidence for these observations ranges between very low and low and the results of the ongoing randomized trials are necessary to confirm the results with higher level of evidence.
本荟萃分析旨在总结目前关于术后原位导管癌(DCIS)患者中追加放疗的作用及超分割放疗疗效的证据,并对证据质量进行分级。
通过MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆以及主要国际会议的会议记录进行全面的系统电子检索。如果研究调查了DCIS患者中超分割放疗与标准放疗的疗效,或追加放疗与不追加放疗的疗效,则这些研究被认为符合条件。感兴趣的结局是局部复发的数量。采用标准的荟萃分析程序计算合并估计值。
13项试验被认为符合条件并进一步分析。在总体队列中,接受追加放疗与未接受追加放疗的患者之间,局部复发风险未观察到差异(12项研究,6943例患者;比值比(OR):0.91,95%置信区间(CI):0.77 - 1.08,证据水平极低)。然而,我们发现切缘阳性患者接受追加放疗与未接受追加放疗相比,局部复发风险降低(6项研究,811例患者;OR:0.56,95%CI:0.36 - 0.87,证据水平极低)。接受超分割放疗与标准放疗的患者之间,局部复发率未观察到差异(4项研究,2534例患者;OR:0.78,95%CI:0.58 - 1.03,证据水平低)。
对于保乳手术后的DCIS患者,超分割放疗似乎是一种安全的选择,而追加放疗可降低切缘阳性患者的局部复发风险。然而,这些观察结果的证据水平在极低到低之间,正在进行的随机试验结果对于以更高证据水平证实这些结果是必要的。