Shaitelman Simona F, Lei Xiudong, Thompson Alastair, Schlembach Pamela, Bloom Elizabeth S, Arzu Isidora Y, Buchholz Daniel, Chronowski Gregory, Dvorak Tomas, Grade Emily, Hoffman Karen, Perkins George, Reed Valerie K, Shah Shalin J, Stauder Michael C, Strom Eric A, Tereffe Welela, Woodward Wendy A, Amaya Diana N, Shen Yu, Hortobagyi Gabriel N, Hunt Kelly K, Buchholz Thomas A, Smith Benjamin D
Simona F. Shaitelman, Xiudong Lei, Alastair Thompson, Pamela Schlembach, Elizabeth S. Bloom, Isidora Y. Arzu, Gregory Chronowski, Karen Hoffman, George Perkins, Valerie K. Reed, Shalin J. Shah, Michael C. Stauder, Eric A. Strom, Welela Tereffe, Wendy A. Woodward, Diana N. Amaya, Yu Shen, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kelly K. Hunt, and Benjamin D. Smith, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Daniel Buchholz and Tomas Dvorak, Orlando Health UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL; Emily Grade, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert AZ; and Thomas A. Buchholz, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 31;36(35):JCO1800317. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00317.
The adoption of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) remains low, in part because of concerns regarding its safety when used with a tumor bed boost or in patients who have received chemotherapy or have large breast size. To address this, we conducted a randomized, multicenter trial to compare conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI; 50 Gy/25 fx + 10 to 14 Gy/5 to 7 fx) with HF-WBI (42.56 Gy/16 fx + 10 to 12.5 Gy/4 to 5 fx).
From 2011 to 2014, 287 women with stage 0 to II breast cancer were randomly assigned to CF-WBI or HF-WBI, stratified by chemotherapy, margin status, cosmesis, and breast size. The trial was designed to test the hypothesis that HF-WBI is not inferior to CF-WBI with regard to the proportion of patients with adverse cosmetic outcome 3 years after radiation, assessed using the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale. Secondary outcomes included photographically assessed cosmesis scored by a three-physician panel and local recurrence-free survival. Analyses were intention to treat.
A total of 286 patients received the protocol-specified radiation dose, 30% received chemotherapy, and 36.9% had large breast size. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Median follow-up was 4.1 years. Three-year adverse cosmetic outcome was 5.4% lower with HF-WBI ( P = .002; absolute risks were 8.2% [n = 8] with HF-WBI v 13.6% [n = 15] with CF-WBI). For those treated with chemotherapy, adverse cosmetic outcome was higher by 4.1% (90% upper confidence limit, 15.0%) with HF-WBI than with CF-WBI; for large breast size, adverse cosmetic outcome was 18.6% lower (90% upper confidence limit, -8.0%) with HF-WBI. Poor or fair photographically assessed cosmesis was noted in 28.8% of CF-WBI patients and 35.4% of HF-WBI patients ( P = .31). Three-year local recurrence-free survival was 99% with both HF-WBI and CF-WBI ( P = .37).
Three years after WBI followed by a tumor bed boost, outcomes with hypofractionation and conventional fractionation are similar. Tumor bed boost, chemotherapy, and larger breast size do not seem to be strong contraindications to HF-WBI.
大分割全乳照射(HF-WBI)的采用率仍然较低,部分原因是担心其与瘤床加量联合使用时,或在接受过化疗或乳房体积较大的患者中使用时的安全性。为解决这一问题,我们进行了一项随机、多中心试验,以比较常规分割全乳照射(CF-WBI;50 Gy/25次 + 10至14 Gy/5至7次)与HF-WBI(42.56 Gy/16次 + 10至12.5 Gy/4至5次)。
2011年至2014年,287例0至II期乳腺癌女性被随机分配至CF-WBI组或HF-WBI组,按化疗、切缘状态、美容效果和乳房大小进行分层。该试验旨在检验以下假设:就放疗后3年出现不良美容效果的患者比例而言,HF-WBI不劣于CF-WBI,采用乳腺癌治疗结果量表进行评估。次要结局包括由三名医生组成的小组通过照片评估的美容效果评分以及局部无复发生存率。分析采用意向性分析。
共有286例患者接受了方案规定的放射剂量,30%的患者接受了化疗,36.9%的患者乳房体积较大。基线特征平衡良好。中位随访时间为4.1年。HF-WBI组的3年不良美容效果降低了5.4%(P = 0.002;HF-WBI组的绝对风险为8.2% [n = 8],CF-WBI组为13.6% [n = 15])。对于接受化疗的患者,HF-WBI组的不良美容效果比CF-WBI组高4.1%(90%置信上限,15.0%);对于乳房体积较大的患者,HF-WBI组的不良美容效果降低了18.6%(90%置信上限,-8.0%)。CF-WBI组28.8%的患者和HF-WBI组35.4%的患者照片评估美容效果较差或一般(P = 0.31)。HF-WBI组和CF-WBI组三年局部无复发生存率均为99%(P = 0.37)。
在全乳照射后进行瘤床加量治疗3年后,大分割照射与常规分割照射的结果相似。瘤床加量、化疗和乳房体积较大似乎并非HF-WBI的强烈禁忌证。