黏弹性补充疗法:技术、适应证、结果

Viscosupplementation: techniques, indications, results.

作者信息

Legré-Boyer V

机构信息

Institut de l'Appareil Locomoteur Nollet, 23, rue Brochant, 75017 Paris, France; Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, 72013 Paris, France; Hôpital américain de Paris, 92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1 Suppl):S101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.027. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

Abstract

Viscosupplementation by hyaluronic acid (HA) injections is frequently used for local treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), due to ease of use and good tolerance. A profusion of linear or reticulated HA derivates are marketed, with varied characters and levels of evidence. Viscosupplementation has demonstrated moderate but significant efficacy (20%) versus placebo in terms of pain and function, with a high rate of responders (60-70%) in knee osteoarthritis. It allows reduced administration of opioid analgesics and NSAIDs, with improved risk/benefit ratio, and may delay joint replacement. Cartilage protection remains to be proven. Clinical efficacy shows 1-4 weeks' later onset than corticosteroids, but is maintained for 6 or even 12 months. Systematic association of corticosteroid and HA injection is not justified, and an interval has to be left before undertaking arthroplasty. Intra-articular injection of HA requires a skilled specialist, and may be difficult in a non-swollen joint; some tips and tricks may be helpful. In other joints than the knee, radiologic or ultrasound guidance is recommended. The efficacy of viscosupplementation is a matter of ongoing debate, after discordant findings in some meta-analyses. Some poor results may be due to inappropriate use of HA injections, poorly adapted to the patient's OA phenotype. Viscosupplementation is a treatment for chronic moderate symptomatic OA, and not for flares with joint swelling. Application in sport-related chondropathy has yet to be properly assessed. The optimal response profile remains to be determined. The ideal indication in the knee seems to be moderate femorotibial OA without swelling. Results have been generally disappointing in hip osteoarthritis but promising in OA of the ankle and shoulder (with and without rotator cuff tear). Further studies are needed to determine response profile and optimal treatment schedule, according to the joint.

摘要

由于使用方便且耐受性良好,通过注射透明质酸(HA)进行粘弹性补充常用于骨关节炎(OA)的局部治疗。市场上有大量线性或网状的HA衍生物出售,其特性和证据水平各不相同。在疼痛和功能方面,与安慰剂相比,粘弹性补充已显示出中等但显著的疗效(20%),在膝关节骨关节炎中反应者比例较高(60-70%)。它可以减少阿片类镇痛药和非甾体抗炎药的使用,改善风险/效益比,并可能延迟关节置换。软骨保护作用仍有待证实。临床疗效显示起效时间比皮质类固醇晚1-4周,但可维持6个月甚至12个月。皮质类固醇和HA注射的系统性联合并不合理,在进行关节置换术前必须留出一段时间间隔。关节内注射HA需要技术熟练的专科医生,在非肿胀关节中操作可能困难;一些技巧可能会有所帮助。在膝关节以外的其他关节,建议采用放射学或超声引导。在一些荟萃分析结果不一致之后,粘弹性补充的疗效一直存在争议。一些不佳结果可能是由于HA注射使用不当,未很好地适应患者的OA表型。粘弹性补充是一种治疗慢性中度症状性OA的方法,而非用于关节肿胀的发作期。在与运动相关的软骨病中的应用尚未得到恰当评估。最佳反应情况仍有待确定。膝关节的理想适应证似乎是无肿胀的中度股胫关节OA。在髋骨关节炎中结果通常令人失望,但在踝关节和肩关节OA(有或无肩袖撕裂)中前景良好。需要进一步研究以根据关节确定反应情况和最佳治疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索