Suppr超能文献

直肠癌机器人手术的现状:全景审视。

Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A bird's eye view.

作者信息

Pai Ajit, Melich George, Marecik Slawomir J, Park John J, Prasad Leela M

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1775, Dempster Street, Park Ridge, IL 60068, USA.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):29-34. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147682.

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer is now widely performed via the laparoscopic approach and has been validated in randomized controlled trials to be oncologically safe with better perioperative outcomes than open surgery including shorter length of stay, earlier return of bowel function, better cosmesis, and less analgesic requirement. Laparoscopic surgery, however, has inherent limitations due to two-dimensional vision, restricted instrument motion and a very long learning curve. Robotic surgery with its superb three-dimensional magnified optics, stable retraction platform and 7 degrees of freedom of instrument movement offers significant benefits during Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) including ease of operation, markedly lower conversion rates and better quality of the specimen in addition to shorter (steeper) learning curves. This review summarizes the current evidence for the adoption of robotic TME for rectal cancer with supporting data from the literature and from the authors' own experience. All relevant articles from PubMed using the search terms listed below and published between 2000 and 2014 including randomized trials, meta-analyses, prospective studies, and retrospective reviews with substantial numbers were included.

摘要

目前,直肠癌的微创手术主要通过腹腔镜入路广泛开展,并且在随机对照试验中已得到验证,其在肿瘤学上是安全的,围手术期结局优于开放手术,包括住院时间更短、肠功能恢复更早、美容效果更好以及镇痛需求更少。然而,由于二维视野、器械运动受限以及学习曲线非常长,腹腔镜手术存在固有的局限性。机器人手术凭借其出色的三维放大光学系统、稳定的牵拉平台以及器械运动的7个自由度,在全直肠系膜切除(TME)过程中具有显著优势,包括操作简便、明显更低的中转率、更好的标本质量,此外学习曲线更短(更陡)。本综述总结了采用机器人TME治疗直肠癌的当前证据,并提供了来自文献和作者自身经验的支持数据。纳入了2000年至2014年间发表在PubMed上的所有相关文章,包括随机试验、荟萃分析、前瞻性研究以及大量的回顾性综述,检索词如下。

相似文献

1
Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A bird's eye view.
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):29-34. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147682.
2
[Current status and novel approach of robotic surgery for rectal cancer].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;18(8):755-8.
3
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
4
The role of the robotic technique in minimally invasive surgery in rectal cancer.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2013 Sep 26;7:357. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.357.
5
Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jul;58(7):659-67. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000385.
6
Total mesorectal excision: open, laparoscopic or robotic.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;203:47-55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_6.
7
Systematic review of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):569-581. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5978-y. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Operative Technique and Review of the Literature.
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020 Jan 30;4(1):14-24. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2019-037. eCollection 2020.
10
Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review with a meta-analysis.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jun;34(6):983-991. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03307-0. Epub 2019 May 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Effective implementation and adaptation of structured robotic colorectal programme in a busy tertiary unit.
J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01169-1. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
4K ultra HD technology reduces operative time and intraoperative blood loss in colorectal laparoscopic surgery.
F1000Res. 2020 Feb 11;9:106. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21297.1. eCollection 2020.
6
Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Nov 27;8(11):744-754. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i11.744.
7
Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2820-2828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5292-0. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
8
Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.
F1000Res. 2016 Sep 26;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9389.1. eCollection 2016.
9
Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):546-56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.546.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1072-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.02.235. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
J Surg Res. 2014 May 15;188(2):404-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
3
Modifiable factors to decrease the cost of robotic-assisted procedures.
AORN J. 2013 Oct;98(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.08.012.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(3):210-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
6
Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature.
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S47-53. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0939-x. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
7
The learning curve for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Oct;22(5):400-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182622c2d.
9
Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: is there a learning curve?
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2471-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2216-5. Epub 2012 Mar 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验