Suppr超能文献

双侧重复经颅磁刺激治疗精神分裂症患者幻听:一项随机对照交叉研究

Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Auditory Hallucinations in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled, Cross-over Study.

作者信息

Kim Eun-Ji, Yeo Seonguk, Hwang Inho, Park Jong-Il, Cui Yin, Jin Hong-Mei, Kim Hyung Tae, Hwang Tae-Young, Chung Young-Chul

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea. ; Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2014 Dec;12(3):222-8. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2014.12.3.222. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A randomized double-blind cross-over trial was conducted in patients with persistent auditory hallucinations (AHs) to investigate whether bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the temporoparietal area or Broca's area is more effective at high- or low-frequencies compared to a sham condition.

METHODS

Twenty three patients with persistent AHs who remained stable on the same medication for 2 months were enrolled. They were randomized to one of four conditions: low-frequency (1 Hz)-rTMS to the temporoparietal area (L-TP), high-frequency (20 Hz)-rTMS to the temporoparietal area (H-TP), high-frequency (20 Hz)-rTMS to Broca's area (H-B), or sham.

RESULTS

All the four rTMS conditions resulted in significant decrease in the scores under the auditory hallucination rating scale and hallucination change scale over time. However, there were no significant treatment effects or interaction between time and treatment, suggesting no superior effects of the new paradigms over the sham condition.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that bilateral rTMS at the temporoparietal area or Broca's area with high- or low-frequency does not produce superior effects in reducing AHs compared to sham stimulation.

摘要

目的

对持续性幻听(AHs)患者进行一项随机双盲交叉试验,以研究与假刺激相比,颞顶叶区域或布洛卡区的双侧重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在高频或低频时是否更有效。

方法

招募了23名持续性AHs患者,他们在相同药物治疗下保持稳定状态达2个月。将他们随机分为四种情况之一:颞顶叶区域的低频(1Hz)-rTMS(L-TP)、颞顶叶区域的高频(20Hz)-rTMS(H-TP)、布洛卡区的高频(20Hz)-rTMS(H-B)或假刺激。

结果

随着时间推移,所有四种rTMS情况均导致幻听评分量表和幻觉变化量表的得分显著降低。然而,没有显著的治疗效果或时间与治疗之间的相互作用,这表明新方案并不比假刺激有更好的效果。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与假刺激相比,颞顶叶区域或布洛卡区的高频或低频双侧rTMS在减少AHs方面并没有产生更好的效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b89/4293169/e6dfe9d1d1a9/cpn-12-222-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验