Mousavi Seyed Mohsen, Hemminki Kari
aGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany bCancer Registration Office, Department of Medical and Pharmaceutical Services, Department of Health, Basel City, Switzerland cCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015 Mar;24 Suppl 1:S1-S63. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000106.
This review aimed at covering cancer risk trends by site and histology in first-generation and second-generation immigrants in Sweden compared with natives. In addition, we reviewed data on cancer survival in immigrants to explore factors explaining cancer survival in the entire population. The Swedish Family-Cancer Database was used to calculate standardized incidence ratios and hazard ratios (HRs) of death from cancer in 77,360 and 993,824 cases among first-generation, and 4356 and 263,485 cases among second-generation immigrants and Swedes, respectively. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratio. To obtain the maximum number of cases, we classified the immigrants according to geographical setting, population, and/or cancer risk. Compared with native Swedes, the highest risk of cancer was observed for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Southeast Asian men (standardized incidence ratio=35.6) and women (24.6), for hypopharyngeal carcinoma in Indian men (5.4), for squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus in Iranian women (3.8), for cardia of the stomach in East Asian women (4.2), for signet-ring cell carcinoma of the stomach in Southeast Asian women (6.7), for the liver in East Asian men (6.8), for the gall bladder in Indian women (3.8), for the pancreas in North African men (2.2), for large cell carcinoma of the lung in former Yugoslavian men (4.2), for pleural mesothelioma in Turkish women (23.8), for the cervix in Danes (1.6), for seminoma in Chileans (2.1), for transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder in Asian Arab men (2.3), for meningioma in former Yugoslavians (1.3), and for papillary carcinoma of the thyroid in East and Southeast Asian men (3.6). No immigrant groups had an increased risk of breast, uterus, ovary, and prostate cancers or nervous system tumors. The HRs for all breast cancers were between 1.0 in low-risk Europeans and 1.2 in lowest-risk non-Europeans. Low-risk non-Europeans had an HR of 2.9 for lobular carcinoma. Low-risk non-Europeans were diagnosed in a higher T-class (odds ratio=1.9) than Swedes. The HRs for prostate cancer were 0.6 in Turks, Middle Easterners, Asians, and Chileans. In conclusion, environmental and behavioral factors, early-childhood exposures, and infections may play a major role in the risk of esophageal, stomach, liver, nasopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers, malignant pleural mesothelioma, breast, gynecological, testicular, urinary bladder, and thyroid cancers. Pancreatic cancer and nervous system tumors may have a major genetic component in the etiology. The ethnic differences in the risk of breast cancer by histology had no major influence on survival. Middle Easterners, Asians, and Chileans, with the lowest risk of prostate cancer, also had the most favorable survival, suggesting a biological mechanism for this finding.
本综述旨在涵盖瑞典第一代和第二代移民与瑞典本地人相比,按部位和组织学划分的癌症风险趋势。此外,我们还回顾了移民癌症生存数据,以探索解释整个人口中癌症生存情况的因素。瑞典家庭癌症数据库用于计算第一代移民中77360例和993824例、第二代移民和瑞典人中4356例和263485例癌症死亡的标准化发病率和风险比(HRs)。采用有序逻辑回归分析计算比值比。为了获得最大数量的病例,我们根据地理环境、人群和/或癌症风险对移民进行分类。与瑞典本地人相比,东南亚男性(标准化发病率=35.6)和女性(24.6)的鼻咽癌风险最高,印度男性下咽癌(5.4)、伊朗女性食管鳞状细胞癌(3.8)、东亚女性胃贲门癌(4.2)、东南亚女性胃印戒细胞癌(6.7)、东亚男性肝癌(6.8)、印度女性胆囊癌(3.8)、北非男性胰腺癌(2.2)、前南斯拉夫男性肺大细胞癌(4.2)、土耳其女性恶性胸膜间皮瘤(23.8)、丹麦人宫颈癌(1.6)、智利人精原细胞瘤(2.1)、亚洲阿拉伯男性膀胱移行细胞癌(2.3)、前南斯拉夫人脑膜瘤(1.3)以及东亚和东南亚男性甲状腺乳头状癌(3.6)的癌症风险最高。没有移民群体患乳腺癌、子宫癌、卵巢癌、前列腺癌或神经系统肿瘤的风险增加。所有乳腺癌的风险比在低风险欧洲人为1.0至最低风险非欧洲人为1.2之间。低风险非欧洲人小叶癌的风险比为2.9。低风险非欧洲人比瑞典人被诊断为更高的T分期(比值比=1.9)。土耳其人、中东人、亚洲人和智利人前列腺癌的风险比为0.6。总之,环境和行为因素、儿童早期暴露和感染可能在食管癌、胃癌、肝癌、鼻咽癌和下咽癌、恶性胸膜间皮瘤、乳腺癌、妇科癌、睾丸癌、膀胱癌和甲状腺癌的风险中起主要作用。胰腺癌和神经系统肿瘤在病因学上可能有主要的遗传成分。按组织学划分的乳腺癌风险的种族差异对生存没有重大影响。前列腺癌风险最低的中东人、亚洲人和智利人也有最有利的生存情况,这表明这一发现存在生物学机制。