Rauck Richard L, North James, Eisenach James C
Carolina's Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Pain. 2015 Jan;156(1):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000007.
Chronic pain may be accompanied by hyperalgesia and allodynia, and analgesic interventions may reduce these hypersensitivity phenomena. Preclinical data suggest that intrathecal clonidine and adenosine reduce hypersensitivity, but only clonidine reduces pain; therefore, we tested the effects of these interventions in patients with chronic pain. Twenty-two subjects with pain and hyperalgesia in a lower extremity from complex regional pain syndrome were recruited in a double-blind crossover study to receive intrathecal clonidine, 100 μg, or adenosine, 2 mg. Primary outcome measure was proportion with ≥30% reduction in pain 2 hours after injection, and secondary measures were pain report, areas of hypersensitivity, and temporal summation to heat stimuli. Treatments did not differ in the primary outcome measure (10 met success criterion after clonidine administration and 5 after adenosine administration), although they did differ in pain scores over time, with clonidine having a 3-fold greater effect (P = 0.014). Both drugs similarly reduced areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia by approximately 30% and also inhibited temporal summation. The percentage change in pain report did not correlate with the percentage change in areas of hyperalgesia (P = 0.09, r = 0.08) or allodynia (P = 0.24, r = 0.24) after drug treatment. Both intrathecal clonidine and adenosine acutely inhibit experimentally induced and clinical hypersensitivity in patients with chronic regional pain syndrome. Although these drugs do not differ in analgesia by the primary outcome measure, their difference in effect on pain scores over time and lack of correlation between effect on pain and hypersensitivity suggest that analgesia does not parallel antihyperalgesia with these treatments.
慢性疼痛可能伴有痛觉过敏和异常性疼痛,而镇痛干预措施可能会减轻这些超敏现象。临床前数据表明,鞘内注射可乐定和腺苷可减轻超敏反应,但只有可乐定能减轻疼痛;因此,我们在慢性疼痛患者中测试了这些干预措施的效果。在一项双盲交叉研究中,招募了22名患有复杂区域疼痛综合征且下肢疼痛和痛觉过敏的受试者,分别接受鞘内注射100μg可乐定或2mg腺苷。主要结局指标是注射后2小时疼痛减轻≥30%的比例,次要指标是疼痛报告、超敏区域和对热刺激的时间总和。在主要结局指标方面,两种治疗方法没有差异(可乐定给药后10人达到成功标准,腺苷给药后5人达到成功标准),尽管它们在不同时间的疼痛评分上存在差异,可乐定的效果是腺苷的3倍(P = 0.014)。两种药物同样使痛觉过敏和异常性疼痛区域减少了约30%,并且也抑制了时间总和。药物治疗后,疼痛报告的百分比变化与痛觉过敏区域的百分比变化(P = 0.09,r = 0.08)或异常性疼痛区域的百分比变化(P = 0.24,r = 0.24)均无相关性。鞘内注射可乐定和腺苷均可急性抑制慢性区域疼痛综合征患者实验诱导的和临床的超敏反应。尽管这些药物在主要结局指标的镇痛效果上没有差异,但它们在不同时间对疼痛评分的影响以及对疼痛和超敏反应的影响之间缺乏相关性,这表明这些治疗方法的镇痛作用与抗痛觉过敏作用并不平行。