Azad M A K, Ellerbrok D, Barthlott W, Koch K
Nees Institute for Biodiversity of Plants, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Bonn. Venusbergweg 22, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Bioinspir Biomim. 2015 Jan 19;10(1):016004. doi: 10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016004.
We analyzed the fog collection efficiency of three different sets of samples: replica (with and without microstructures), copper wire (smooth and microgrooved) and polyolefin mesh (hydrophilic, superhydrophilic and hydrophobic). The collection efficiency of the samples was compared in each set separately to investigate the influence of microstructures and/or the wettability of the surfaces on fog collection. Based on the controlled experimental conditions chosen here large differences in the efficiency were found. We found that microstructured plant replica samples collected 2-3 times higher amounts of water than that of unstructured (smooth) samples. Copper wire samples showed similar results. Moreover, microgrooved wires had a faster dripping of water droplets than that of smooth wires. The superhydrophilic mesh tested here was proved more efficient than any other mesh samples with different wettability. The amount of collected fog by superhydrophilic mesh was about 5 times higher than that of hydrophilic (untreated) mesh and was about 2 times higher than that of hydrophobic mesh.
复制品(有和无微结构)、铜线(光滑和有微槽)以及聚烯烃网(亲水、超亲水和疏水)。分别对每组样品的收集效率进行比较,以研究微结构和/或表面润湿性对雾收集的影响。基于此处选择的受控实验条件,发现效率存在很大差异。我们发现有微结构的植物复制品样品收集的水量比无结构(光滑)样品高出2至3倍。铜线样品显示出类似的结果。此外,有微槽的线比光滑的线水滴滴落得更快。此处测试的超亲水网被证明比任何其他具有不同润湿性的网样品更有效。超亲水网收集的雾量约为亲水(未处理)网的5倍,约为疏水网的2倍。